[NCSG-PC] O.com comment

[farzaneh badii]

I will go through it. I think we need an extension.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:34 AM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is this comment coming together, or should I draft one? I note the
> deadline is in two days time...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 10 June 2018 2:31 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
> thanks for raising this. it is quite an old issue and need to ask those
> who were involved before 2007. On another hand, I think the similar issue
> is the 2-letters characters and it is something that Farzaneh worked on and
> followed closely. she may give us some guidance here.
> for auctions, I don't think they are not intended to be for ICANN but for
> non-profit organisations serving internet community (likely separate from
> ICANN). the idea is worthy to be explored but my concern is that will
> encourage ICANN to leave more of its responsibility and count on these
> uncertain auctions to fund community activities.
>
> I think 0.com is still reserved as in the same process that reserved
> other 1 character like o.com, so the security risk may raise later if
> 0.com is requested to be removed from the reserved list.
>
> for NCSG draft comment, I think Bruna will submit one by this Monday.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 06:10, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So I have been reading up on the allocation of single character gTLDs
>> vis-a-vis this comment
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/o-com-single-char-2018-05-10-en>
>> on the potential release of O.com. This issue has been brewing for some
>> time, however I was wondering if the NCSG/NCUC/predecessor had released a
>> comment on this issue. I could find a personal comment from Avri
>> <https://forum.icann.org/lists/allocationmethods/msg00007.html> back in
>> 2007 but not quite anything from us. Did we ever comment on this?
>>
>> Also, I was wondering our thoughts on where the money from the sale of
>> O.com (and potentially other single character .coms) should go. I am
>> opposed to this money going into the new gTLD Auction Proceeds fund, an
>> idea I have seen floated around. I don't want to create a big burdensome
>> programme here but I do think we should spend the funds on the ICANN
>> community. CROP and ABRs are being cut, so perhaps these funds could be put
>> aside to advance and sustain these community programmes in the future.
>>
>> Finally, could someone reasonably confuse O.com (letter 'o') with 0.com
>> (number zero)? I think they could...
>>
>> Ayden
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180618/0262e734/attachment.htm>