[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [Gnso-sc-budget] FW: [community-finance] ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy Public Comment Report Published

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thanks Rafik.

Will be interesting to see, now that we have spotted this, how they do version control on the ICANN website... will they pretend nothing happened and just re-upload a new PDF, or keep this up for historical purposes and post an additional, corrected report?

I think this is important, as I am often left wondering how ICANN staff analyse comments - now that they have published a report absent half our comments, and presumably it was published following some kind of internal review, will a revised report have *any* impact?

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 7 June 2018 12:08 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ayden,
>
> I will reach Xavier to raise that.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 18:06, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hopefully this was just an oversight and not intentional. If not corrected, we might have to write another letter -- our comments are not being included in the staff reports of public comments if they cut against the grain, while those supporting the staff recommendations are in there...
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 7 June 2018 12:03 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for sharing this, Berry.
>>>
>>> I have now reviewed the report of public comments and it seems to have thoroughly captured the comments of the GNSO Council.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it did not capture the comments of the NCSG in a comprehensive manner, ignoring the NCSG's comment altogether that we oppose the use of auction proceeds to replenish the reserve fund, while including comments from the ccNSO that were favourable towards the use of this resource. The NCSG's request that moving forward a quarterly update be provided so that the community can see how decisions made in relation to the Reserve Fund are being delivered was also not included.
>>>
>>> I am not sure how this report is compiled, or how staff determine what comments to include or not, but a complete report, in my opinion, is one which includes all comments submitted in good faith. I would encourage others to review this report of public comments and to take inventory of what comments from your constituency/stakeholder group have been included (or not included). I do hope the omission of some comments was just an oversight.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On 7 June 2018 6:50 AM, <mail at berrycobb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> FYI, the Report of Public comments for the Reserve Fund Replenishment is now available for review.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> B
>>>>
>>>> Berry A. Cobb
>>>>
>>>> 720.839.5735
>>>>
>>>> mail at berrycobb.com
>>>>
>>>> @berrycobb
>>>>
>>>> From: community-finance [mailto:community-finance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Planning
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 19:54
>>>> To: community-finance at icann.org
>>>> Subject: [community-finance] ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy Public Comment Report Published
>>>>
>>>> We wanted to inform you that the ICANN organization’s Report of Public Comments on the Reserve Fund Proposed Replenishment Strategy has been published.  Included in the publication is a summary of the replenishment strategy responses from each commenter (section IV additional information).
>>>>
>>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-en
>>>>
>>>> The ICANN org has received valuable and substantive comments from the public comment proceeding and wishes to thank everyone for your contributions in this important planning process.
>>>>
>>>> Shani Quidwai
>>>>
>>>> ICANN- Director, Financial Planning and Analysis
>>>>
>>>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>>>
>>>> Los Angeles, CA 90064
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: (310) 804-7684
>>>>
>>>> Office: (310) 578-8664
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180607/69a840fb/attachment.htm>