[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

[Ayden Férdeline]

There are over 230 data sets. What is the harm in having one more data set? I think is is important and relevant, and I note that an existing data set is community travel expenditure. Why one standard for community expenditure, and another for staff?

Ayden

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 09:16, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Agree with Rafik here. I do not support adding the point about staff travel. I don’t believe this data is important or relevant.
> Cheers,
>  Tanya
>
> On Fri 27. Jul 2018 at 09:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ayden,
>>
>> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
>> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, I am personally not interested in such information, other PC members can chime in and support or not.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and I’d like it to be inserted.
>>>
>>> In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>>>
>>> Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air travel (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days in advance of travel that the trip was booked, department, reason for travel, and total cost of the trip;
>>>
>>> The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>>>
>>> I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an existing data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community travel expenditure.
>>>
>>> So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff. I know it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s important to ask.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>
>>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the review and comments:
>>>>
>>>> those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>>>> - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I don't see any objection.
>>>> - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so checking if the current text capture the comments there
>>>> - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits. document to be clean up.
>>>>
>>>> please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is objection I will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC for reference). if there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to review for endorsement:
>>>>>
>>>>> - [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> - [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> - [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>>>> - Long-term Option, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> - Short-term Options, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>> - Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>>>> - The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we have several public comments drafts to review for this month:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Open Data Initiative, 27th July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing, that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list but I will do it.
>>>>>> - Long-term Option, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Short-term Options, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/fcfe86db/attachment.htm>