[NCSG-PC] ePDP members consulting with membership

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Avri,

I think the first goal to work on agreed positions on every topic and spend
time toward that including making compromise.

I am not sure that is effective or feasible to have members presenting
different positions when there is expectation from other groups to see one
position.

I have no idea what can the topic where we will have disagreement. while
not presenting position may be safe but I dont know if it is the right
approach. I can understand as principle to have split positions but how
much effective it is in long run and how it can impact negotiation toward
consensus in EPDP itself.

I would go with deciding case by case and weigh the merits of any choice
make and we can from that as outcome.

Best,

Rafik

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 6:03 AM avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:

> (observer)
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11-Jul-18 07:50, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >
> >     Just wanted to bring this up for consideration and I request this
> >     to be seriously discussed. It is well known and agreed that ePDP
> >     members will be advancing and representing the positions of their
> >     appointed groups, not their personal views. This has been agreed
> >     upon based on the nature of this effort.
> >
> >
>
> How will you handle the occasions when the NCSG is split on an issue.
> Will the ePDP members be allowed to represent one of the views expressed
> or will the NCSG have to take no position on issues where there is not
> SG agreement?
>
> avri
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180713/6d0f621b/attachment.htm>