[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Epdp-dt] Candidate Confidentiality

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Sun Jul 1 08:47:21 EEST 2018


Hi,

I am concerned with moving selection to SSC. While it worked fine for other
appointments, I dont think it can do deliberation in such short time. I
would be in both options (and I will do my best): leadership or SSC but
former seems more quicker.
Names of candidates and statements are also made public , in particular for
review teams appointments.

Best.

Rafik

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 1:07 PM Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> Secrecy of the candidate statements is a non-starter.  This is a global
> public policy issue of great public interest and it deserves appropriate
> public scrutiny.  Too often people forget that we are engaging in global
> governance at ICANN, and ICANN’s commitment to transparency in its bylaws
> cannot be ignored or lowered out of concerns about being in the public
> eye.  Accountability demands transparency in the formulation of this
> critical global policy.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:50 PM, dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It should be made clear to candidates upfront that these statements will
> be in public domain. These are positions affect the community and the
> community has the right to know.
> best
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There should be transparency here. I actually think candidate statements
>> (and especially conflict of interest statements) should be made public. The
>> claim of being "sensitive to privacy" is one I am finding difficult to
>> understand.
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 20:19, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
>> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any strong opinions here? This proposal changes the general understanding
>> of, yesterday.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se>
>> *Subject: **Re: [Epdp-dt] Candidate Confidentiality*
>> *Date: *29 June 2018 at 08:22:22 EST
>> *To: *epdp-dt at icann.org, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>
>> I support Donna's position, particularly as the expectation on neutrality
>> (perceived or real) may depend on the eye of the beholder.
>>
>> As Michelle expressed during one of the meetings, who has no vested
>> interest in the results of this PDP?
>>
>>
>> safe travels to all
>> ---
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> carlosraul at gutierrez.se
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Aparatado 1571-1000
>> COSTA RICA
>>
>>
>>
>> El 2018-06-29 07:34, Austin, Donna via Epdp-dt escribió:
>>
>> All
>>
>> Apologies for missing this discussion yesterday. I want to express my
>> reservations about the agreement that the EPDP Chair candidate names be
>> made public. I believe they should be confidential or, at a minimum, the
>> candidates should at least have the option to decide whether they wish to
>> have their candidacy made public. Given the subject matter of this PDP, I
>> thought we might be a bit more sensitive to privacy.
>>
>> I'm also disappointed that the selection task falls to the leadership
>> team. We established a standing selection committee for this purpose. I
>> understand the concerns about being able to undertake the task quickly, but
>> this same pressure will be on the leadership team as well.
>>
>> If the candidate names are public this also puts considerable pressure on
>> the leadership team in terms of lobbying and claims of bias in selection
>> etc. We may also have potential conflicts of interest arise and as there is
>> only three of us this would leave the job to two. The SSC is more
>> representative of the GNSO and has a methodology in place for selections as
>> a result of the processes they've undertaken to date.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Donna
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *100*
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Epdp-dt mailing list
>> Epdp-dt at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Epdp-dt mailing list
>> Epdp-dt at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180701/5cc9fdf5/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list