[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Epdp-dt] Candidate Confidentiality

[dorothy g]

It should be made clear to candidates upfront that these statements will be
in public domain. These are positions affect the community and the
community has the right to know.
best

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> There should be transparency here. I actually think candidate statements
> (and especially conflict of interest statements) should be made public. The
> claim of being "sensitive to privacy" is one I am finding difficult to
> understand.
>
> Ayden
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 20:19, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Any strong opinions here? This proposal changes the general understanding
> of, yesterday.
>
> Martin
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se>
> *Subject: **Re: [Epdp-dt] Candidate Confidentiality*
> *Date: *29 June 2018 at 08:22:22 EST
> *To: *epdp-dt at icann.org, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>
> I support Donna's position, particularly as the expectation on neutrality
> (perceived or real) may depend on the eye of the beholder.
>
> As Michelle expressed during one of the meetings, who has no vested
> interest in the results of this PDP?
>
>
> safe travels to all
> ---
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> carlosraul at gutierrez.se
> +506 8837 7176
> Aparatado 1571-1000
> COSTA RICA
>
>
>
> El 2018-06-29 07:34, Austin, Donna via Epdp-dt escribió:
>
> All
>
> Apologies for missing this discussion yesterday. I want to express my
> reservations about the agreement that the EPDP Chair candidate names be
> made public. I believe they should be confidential or, at a minimum, the
> candidates should at least have the option to decide whether they wish to
> have their candidacy made public. Given the subject matter of this PDP, I
> thought we might be a bit more sensitive to privacy.
>
> I'm also disappointed that the selection task falls to the leadership
> team. We established a standing selection committee for this purpose. I
> understand the concerns about being able to undertake the task quickly, but
> this same pressure will be on the leadership team as well.
>
> If the candidate names are public this also puts considerable pressure on
> the leadership team in terms of lobbying and claims of bias in selection
> etc. We may also have potential conflicts of interest arise and as there is
> only three of us this would leave the job to two. The SSC is more
> representative of the GNSO and has a methodology in place for selections as
> a result of the processes they've undertaken to date.
>
> Thanks
>
> Donna
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
>
> *100*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Epdp-dt mailing list
> Epdp-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Epdp-dt mailing list
> Epdp-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180701/75c12da1/attachment.htm>