[NCSG-PC] Fw: [Gnso-sc-budget] Subsequent Rounds

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Mon Feb 19 01:08:52 EET 2018


Hi Ayden,

That is a valid point. there should be budgeting for the implementation at
the same level and in particular since this is one of the core areas for
ICANN. I would also ask about the budget for ws2 implementation. all these
are impacting ICANN for long-term and so should be consequently budgeted.

I will try to attend the call but I am an observer only.

Best,

Rafik

2018-02-19 3:10 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on this please? Please can you communicate
> your support/concerns ASAP and preferably before the SCBO call tomorrow.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ayden
>>
> -------- Original Message --------
>  On 18 February 2018 6:51 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
> michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >All
> >
> > While the various stakeholder groups might include this in their own
> comments I thought it worthwhile raising this topic here as well.
> > As we all know there currently is a large and active PDP on Subsequent
> Rounds of new TLDs.
> > However as was raised with me the budget does not seem to fully reflect
> this ie. no monies appear to have been earmarked should that PDP reach its
> conclusion and a next round be announced.
> >
> > Jeff Neuman shared the below with me and others and I am sharing it here
> with his permission:
> >
> > "there is nothing in the next ICANN proposed budget that accounts for
> development or resources towards the next round of New gTLDs.  If we want
> the “next round” to begin in 2020, then surely the FY 2019 Budget which
> contains the initiatives for ICANN from July 2018 through June 2019 MUST
> contain some funds to start the prep work.  In fact, for the 2012 Round,
> the budgeting for that round began in FY 2008.  The reason it began in FY
> 2008 (prepared during FY 2007) is because it was originally assumed that
> that the opening of the round would be in FY 2010 (or late 2009).  That was
> the assumption because they knew they would get the GNSO’s final report in
> at the end of FY 2008.  See https://www.icann.org/
> resources/unthemed-pages/adopted-budget-2007-06-29-en#_Toc170817093. "
> >
> > Jeff indicates that the PDP would probably be done before the end of
> FY19 so the lack of budgeted resources naturally concerns him.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Michele
> >
> >
> >
> >Mr Michele Neylon
> > Blacknight Solutions
> > Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> >https://www.blacknight.com
> >https://blacknight.blog /
> >http://ceo.hosting/
> > Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> > Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> >
> >Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> Park,Sleaty
> > Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265
> > ,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> >
> >
> >Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
> >Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180219/e526de1c/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list