[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [NCPH-Intersessional2018] Suggestion to the process of selecting an NCPH board member

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

We agreed during the session I co-chaired to have a small team(Wolf-Ulrich,
Steve, Farzaneh and myself) to work on the process before presenting it to
NCSG/CSG. To prepare the session, I did dig in mailing lists and recordings
but I think we are going to start with the strawperson we had since Iceland.

Best,

Rafik


On Feb 4, 2018 11:41 AM, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Ayden

Before starting the conversation Rafik and I have to talk to a couple of
people who were involved with this last year and then we can start
discussing the counter-proposal. We will do it this week.

Farzaneh

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Just thinking out loud before I consider replying to this thread, I think
> we need a 'consensus view' on a path forward... perhaps we could try to
> piece one together here?
>
> Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> On 3 February 2018 9:58 AM, gangadhar panday via NCPH-Intersessional2018 <
> ncph-intersessional2018 at icann.org> wrote:
>
> I agree with Raoul's view.
>
> On Feb 2, 2018 11:13 PM, Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's have two rounds, where on the second round we have only the two
> candidates that got most votes in the first round. In case the first round
> results in a tie of three or more candidates, the SG that has two or more
> candidates has to choose one for the second round. Both SGs would have one
> candidate each on the second round, despite the results in the first round.
> Having the first round with more than two candidates, means that all the
> NCPH councilors get a say on the best candidates, instead of just their own
> stakeholder group. This way, we can get the opinion of all the NCPH
> councilors on the prospective candidates through votes, instead of trying
> to guess which of the SG's candidates would go through better.
>
> Also, we could make the vote anonymously, to also avoid peer pressure from
> inside the stakeholder group. The amount of candidates for the first round
> can not exceed the amount of GNSO councilors in the SG.
>
> -Raoul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>

_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180204/7de45c88/attachment.htm>