[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [NCPH-Intersessional2018] Suggestion to the process of selecting an NCPH board member

[Ayden Férdeline]

Just thinking out loud before I consider replying to this thread, I think we need a 'consensus view' on a path forward... perhaps we could try to piece one together here?

Ayden

-------- Original Message --------
On 3 February 2018 9:58 AM, gangadhar panday via NCPH-Intersessional2018 <ncph-intersessional2018 at icann.org> wrote:

> I agree with Raoul's view.
>
> On Feb 2, 2018 11:13 PM, Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let's have two rounds, where on the second round we have only the two candidates that got most votes in the first round. In case the first round results in a tie of three or more candidates, the SG that has two or more candidates has to choose one for the second round. Both SGs would have one candidate each on the second round, despite the results in the first round.
>> Having the first round with more than two candidates, means that all the NCPH councilors get a say on the best candidates, instead of just their own stakeholder group. This way, we can get the opinion of all the NCPH councilors on the prospective candidates through votes, instead of trying to guess which of the SG's candidates would go through better.
>>
>> Also, we could make the vote anonymously, to also avoid peer pressure from inside the stakeholder group. The amount of candidates for the first round can not exceed the amount of GNSO councilors in the SG.
>>
>> -Raoul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180203/0eebcf13/attachment.htm>