[NCSG-PC] Auctions proceeds comment review (deadline 11th Dec)

[Stephanie Perrin]

I support this view on both issues

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 9, 2018, at 8:27 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Rafik. I have been further reflecting on this comment and believe we need to revise Recommendation #1 to take a stronger position. I do not support either Mechanism A or B, and would prefer to see us support solely Mechanism C. This is because an independent ICANN Foundation with its own, independent Board of Directors would be more accountable than anything Mechanisms A (utterly unaccountable) or B (weak accountability structure) can offer.
> 
> I have also deleted an edit that said ICANN org should be able to access auction proceeds if it goes through a community consultation process. I do not support this at all, and think it contradicts the rest of our comment where we speak to how funds were supposed to be sequested for charitable purposes.
> 
> Best wishes, Ayden  
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Saturday, 8 December 2018 23:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> with some delay, I could finally go through the draft and makes edits based on comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XL_KZuzd9TD8w74mndklzpHLV37MYrJdGPbW5Ucn0ao/edit. I left the document on suggestion-mode to highlight the changes. I closed some comments that didn't lead to any change (you can still check them).
>> the deadline for submission is the 11th December. please review the comment.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20181211/1998e4e7/attachment.htm>