[NCSG-PC] Auctions proceeds comment review (deadline 11th Dec)

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

no problem with removing the part about access to funds.
however, regarding the options, those who commented in the doc or in the
NCSG list supported option B so I don't see how we can solely support
option C only.

Best,

Rafik


Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 19:38, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> a écrit :

> I have to agree with Ayden, the more shielded those funds are, the better,
> is too much money and really needs to be used 1) only in a financialy
> sustainable way, 2) in charitable projects. The 1) one is more easily
> accountable, but the latter really needs as independent and accountable
> process as it can get.
>
>
> Best,
> Martín
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2018, 22:28 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Rafik. I have been further reflecting on this comment and believe
>> we need to revise Recommendation #1 to take a stronger position. I do not
>> support either Mechanism A or B, and would prefer to see us support solely
>> Mechanism C. This is because an independent ICANN Foundation with its own,
>> independent Board of Directors would be more accountable than anything
>> Mechanisms A (utterly unaccountable) or B (weak accountability structure)
>> can offer.
>>
>> I have also deleted an edit that said ICANN org should be able to access
>> auction proceeds if it goes through a community consultation process. I do
>> not support this at all, and think it contradicts the rest of our comment
>> where we speak to how funds were supposed to be sequested for charitable
>> purposes.
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Saturday, 8 December 2018 23:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> with some delay, I could finally go through the draft and makes edits
>> based on comments:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XL_KZuzd9TD8w74mndklzpHLV37MYrJdGPbW5Ucn0ao/edit.
>> I left the document on suggestion-mode to highlight the changes. I closed
>> some comments that didn't lead to any change (you can still check them).
>> the deadline for submission is the 11th December. please review the
>> comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20181211/92157c2c/attachment.htm>