[NCSG-PC] [update] public comment reviews (submission by 27th Nov)

Tatiana Tropina tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 16:31:53 EET 2018


I am fine with the comment
Cheers
Tanya

On Mon 3. Dec 2018 at 14:28, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Same here, I think I express it also in another email chain for this
> comment.
>
> Best,
> Martín
>
>
> On 3 Dec 2018, at 10:23, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> wrote:
>
> I reviewed it and had no concern.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> @__f_f__
>
> Best Regards
> ____________________________________
>
> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3 Dec 2018, at 13:46, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the deadline for submitting SSAC comment is today:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSi1SLEqk0QcWHmq-R1MBRWZJZ4MpsX2thXfI4sUjXA/edit
> please weigh in and review. the comment is short and reiterating one
> position that was not taken into consideration about term limit. with
> regard to the length of comment, you can find the response of the penholder
> below.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mer. 28 nov. 2018 à 08:19, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> thanks for the comments.
>> the current situation:
>> CCT and Auctions proceed public comments were extended. however I will
>> submit the CCT comment anyway as it is ready (and there was no objection)
>> and I will finalize the auctions proceeds within 24-48hours, we need to
>> move on and close this. There are several suggestions on the pending areas
>> and will put suggested language there based on the input to date.
>>
>> we also have SSAC comment to be submitted by 3rd December and waiting for
>> NCSG PC review:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSi1SLEqk0QcWHmq-R1MBRWZJZ4MpsX2thXfI4sUjXA/edit
>> . I already checked with Tomslin about the report and got his response :
>> "In my assessment of the draft report, the recommendations had a direct
>> correlation to the report items. I also noticed they clarified our concern
>> on methodology. Additional recommendations either addressed our concerns on
>> transparency and accountability or tried to improve how SSAC identified
>> skills for recruitment. So, I didn't find them contentious."
>>
>> we don't have anything else in the pipeline yet for other public
>> comments. I will share asap I got drafts to be reviewed. There are drafting
>> teams for new gTLD subsequent procedures supplemental report, for EPDP
>> initial report (that is with NCSG rep to EPDP team) and volunteers for
>> redcross comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mar. 27 nov. 2018 à 18:47, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> All,
>>> sorry for being late. Work, swamped. Agree that CCT draft can be
>>> submitted. For the AP draft, we really have some issues of disagreement, I
>>> added my opinion where possible. I think most of the time what Rafik
>>> suggests is the middle ground.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 10:33, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> the current situation:
>>>> - CCT draft is in good shape and all comments resolved. it is ready for
>>>> submission unless there is strong objection.
>>>> - Auctions proceeds draft still has some outstanding issues to be
>>>> resolved.
>>>> still waiting for more input and review.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 26 nov. 2018 à 23:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> another reminder about reviewing and finalizing the comments.
>>>>> I will follow-up tomorrow my time to respond to comments and edits.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le dim. 25 nov. 2018 à 09:18, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is a reminder for reviewing the comments.
>>>>>> I cleaned-up the documents accepting most of the edits.  I also added
>>>>>> some comments/questions there for clarification.
>>>>>> I agree they are in good shape. so please review asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>> Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 08:02, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have 2 draft comments to review for submission on 27th November:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - The initial report on Auctions Proceeds:
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XL_KZuzd9TD8w74mndklzpHLV37MYrJdGPbW5Ucn0ao/edit
>>>>>>> - CCT RT final report:
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iRMb8X9mN-8cInJuVyHargHIPM9E1Ibq5LRsYcKUuJg/edit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> please review, add your comments and edits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20181203/85aa189d/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list