[NCSG-PC] Intersessional

[dorothy g]

After reading the various exchanges it sounds like we could be more
effective using strategies other than the intersessional so we should use
2019 to regroup, make sure we are better prepared for dialogue and
negotiation with key stakeholders. Therefore I would support 2020 for the
next intersessional. Also we should have some clear policy outcomes going
in to the next intersessional.
best regards

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
wrote:

> All,
> I am with Rafik here. I don't support having intersessional in 2019. While
> I agree that they were a bit better in 2018, I still think it "mountain
> gave birth to a mouse" situation in both 2018 and 2019, taking into account
> how much time and effort it takes to prepare them and what kind of poor
> outcome, or lack thereof, we have. I do believe that it's easier to
> negotiate with CGS during ICANN meetings -- this is where we got the things
> done (things that were supposed to get done at the intersessional). So I
> would strongly object to submission the decision about holding
> intersessional in 2019 as NCSG PC.
> Also, agree with Rafik that Farzaneh should stay in deliberations as the
> chair term is still not over -- but of course we can't force her to do so.
> Cheers,
> Tanya
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 07:18, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks, Farzaneh.
>> I expressed my opinion before as we should hold the intersessional in
>> 2020 if we want really to change it. I heard carefully to the arguments
>> made but I am still convinced that doesn't make sense to have it in 2019
>> while we may sense a lukewarm position in the other side too.
>> I don't think you should withdraw from deliberations. You are still a
>> member of PC and you got to participate till the end of your term.
>> committee work doesn't stop for few weeks and it is a continuity.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>> Le ven. 31 août 2018 à 12:22, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> NCPH is being asked again by Mary to hold intersessional in 2019 or not.
>>> BC already has said no and hold it in 2020, the CSG EC and others have not
>>> responded. There was some decision from NCUC EC not to have it in 2019 but
>>> hold it in (2020) but that is because I had the impression that this issue
>>> was resolved and this was also NCSG decision but seems like Arsene, Ayden
>>> and Stephanie are in favor of holding it in 2019 as well (all happened on
>>> the NCUC mailing list).
>>>
>>> You need to have a discussion here, perhaps on NCSG mailing list and
>>> tell Mary the decision. We can just say we are undecided. I cannot hold off
>>> the decision until Stephanie becomes chair because Mary needs to know now.
>>> I suggest you also tell NPOC and NCUC that you are revisiting the issue to
>>> see if they change their mind.
>>>
>>> Since I think it was implied that I should not decide since I am
>>> outgoing (despite having discussed this in Feb and there were no comments
>>> on it), I have decided not to engage with this discussion and leave it to
>>> you.
>>>
>>> Just let me know. If I don't hear anything or there is no decision by
>>> Wednesday next week I will let Mary know that NCSG is undecided.
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180831/4c1979ac/attachment.htm>