[NCSG-PC] Deadline Extended: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report - Public Comment

Thu Aug 23 20:14:01 EEST 2018

Omg, AMAZING! Especially considering that the document is starting to take
some form.

Em qui, 23 de ago de 2018 13:54, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Super!!!! We could meet wednesday or thursday next week if you think a
> call would help. I can send a doodle poll if you are interested.
>
> E.
> —
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:31 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> we got some time for this huge document to comment on. A big Phew.
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Emily Barabas
>>
>>
>> Dear Farzaneh,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are writing to let you know that the public comment period
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gtld-subsequent-procedures-initial-2018-07-03-en>
>> for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report has been
>> extended. Public comments will now be accepted through *26 September
>> 2018*. Can you kindly assist in sharing this information with the
>> relevant members of your group?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 04:50
>> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *"jeff.neuman at comlaude.com" <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>, Cheryl
>> Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com>, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>,
>> Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Emily Barabas <
>> emily.barabas at icann.org>, Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>, "
>> gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report - Public
>> Comment
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Farzaneh,
>>
>>
>>
>> We write to you as the Co-Chairs of the GNSO’s New gTLD Subsequent
>> Procedures Working Group (WG), which is tasked with calling upon the
>> community’s collective experiences from the 2012 New gTLD Program round to
>> consider potential changes that may be needed to the existing 2007
>> Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains policy recommendations and
>> implementation. We are pleased to share that the Working Group has reached
>> an important milestone by publishing its Initial Report for Public
>> Comment [icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_gtld-2Dsubsequent-2Dprocedures-2Dinitial-2D2018-2D07-2D03-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=TwT7TfmDQ6Na2XFI7TKEFTn4pi5z-7JSXypjqAP6rRE&e=>.
>> We would like to strongly encourage you to review this report and provide
>> feedback through public comment on the draft preliminary recommendations,
>> options, and questions for community feedback. Your input is essential to
>> the success of this PDP.
>>
>> *1.    Background on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG*
>>
>> The GNSO’s New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG), which was
>> chartered by the GNSO Council to conduct a Policy Development Process
>> (PDP), is seeking to determine what, if any, changes may need to be made to
>> the existing *Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains*
>> [gnso.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues_new-2Dgtlds_pdp-2Ddec05-2Dfr-2Dparta-2D08aug07.htm&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=fAYAOAlC7DqbvB0WyYMiIOXAkUC6kzqPgR62nsJhHCQ&e=> policy
>> recommendations from 8 August 2007 as well as the final Applicant
>> Guidebook [newgtlds.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_applicants_agb&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=iK3CVAc8mCe_CJRGZTBv2B_bDcoekw7F1Tg2uNLpbsI&e=>
>> dated June 2012. As the original policy recommendations as adopted by the
>> GNSO Council and ICANN Board have “been designed to produce systemized and
>> ongoing mechanisms for applicants to propose new top-level domains,” those
>> policy recommendations remain in place for subsequent rounds of the New
>> gTLD Program unless the GNSO Council would decide to modify those policy
>> recommendations via a policy development process. The PDP WG created 5 Work
>> Tracks that are responsible for considering the subjects within its
>> charter. The PDP WG sought community input through two community comment
>> periods. The Working Group has produced its Initial Report, which includes
>> material from the full Working Group and Work Tracks 1-4. Work Track 5,
>> focused on Geographic Names at the Top-Level, was established later than
>> the other Work Tracks and will produce a separate Initial Report.
>>
>>
>>
>> *2.    Information about the Initial Report and the Public Comment*
>>
>> The objective of this Initial Report is to document the Working Group’s
>> deliberations on charter issues and preliminary recommendations, potential
>> options for recommendations, as well as specific questions for which the
>> Working Group is seeking input. Given the large number of issues, and the
>> thousands of hours spent on addressing the 2012 New gTLD Program and
>> improvements that can be made to the program moving forward, unlike other
>> Initial Reports, this one does not contain a “Statement of level of
>> consensus for the recommendations presented in the Initial Report.” The
>> Co-Chairs not only believed that it was premature to measure the level of
>> consensus of the Working Group members of dozens of recommendations
>> contained within the Initial Report, but that doing so could have the
>> unintended consequence of locking Working Group members into positions of
>> support or opposition prior to soliciting public comment from the community
>> on those recommendations. To form such definitive positions at this early
>> of a stage could have the adverse effect of being less open to
>> modifications to those positions as a result of community input.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition, though many of the preliminary recommendations were
>> generally agreed to by members that participated in the different Work
>> Tracks, support has not been assessed amongst the members of the overall
>> Working Group. The Overall Working Group has not sought to form definitive
>> positions on each of these issues at this stage. Therefore, any language in
>> this report that suggests that the Working Group or any of its Work Tracks
>> is making a recommendation should be read as merely a rough assessment by
>> the Working Group Co-Chairs or Work Track leads.
>>
>>
>>
>> After a comprehensive review of public comments received on this report,
>> the Working Group will deliberate further on the preliminary
>> recommendations contained within the Initial Report. It is possible that as
>> a result of the deliberations, there may be supplemental reports released
>> by the Working Group seeking additional public comments. Once all of that
>> is completed, the Co-Chairs will conduct any formal consensus call(s) at
>> the plenary level, on all recommendations before the Working Group issues
>> its Final Report.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration of this request. We look forward to any
>> comments and any input that you and the organization you Chair are able to
>> provide to our WG. While we of course welcome input on any area of the
>> report, we would like to stress that given the extensive number of topics
>> and preliminary outcomes, you should not feel compelled to respond to every
>> single preliminary recommendation, option, and question. If possible,
>> please submit your comments and input to us by 5 September 2018 so that we
>> may fully consider it in our further deliberations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Nathalie Peregrine
>>
>> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO)
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
>> <http://nathalie.peregrine@icann.org%20>
>>
>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and
>> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180823/624ad1d8/attachment.htm>