[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison to the GAC

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

	I agree with Avri, and others, in the sense that this is not going to be a Team that will have NCSG reps, this is one GAC Liaison for the whole GNSO, so it is far more important it can fully navigate procedures, formalities and very high end work than other qualities, if it would be a GNSO team following GAD work, then I would have a different approach, maybe giving more trust to someone I believe more sensitive to NCSG core issues or deep knowledge on NCSG matters, so it can balance out perspectives, and several head will share they GAC knowledge to make it work. Since is only one person for the whole bridge between GNSO and GAC, I would be more happy to recommend one or two that have deep knowledge on how GNSO/GAC procedures work. Reviewing all, I think our first two choices do stand out.
	For the same reasons I just exposed, I think this is not the best scenario to “use it to make leadership”, since is not an NCSG slot what we are trying to fill.

	As always, I can be convinced otherwise with the right arguments, this are just my intuitions, although strong.

Cheers,
Martín
	

> On Sep 10, 2017, at 12:45 AM, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
> 
> (observer)
> 
> Should be someone of very familiar with GNSO procedures &c.
> and have some knowledge of how GAC and gov'ts work.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc