[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison to the GAC

Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com
Fri Sep 8 15:39:27 EEST 2017 

Agree Rafik.


On 08/09/2017 13:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> due to the time constraint and since we have 2 candidates, we can 
> endorse both and send their applications to SSC. if there is no 
> objection, I can submit them just before 23:59UTC.
> looking to hear from other PC members.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I believe, to support
>     their candidacies — we have not been delegated the responsibility
>     as PC of selecting the liaison.
>
>     Best wishes,
>
>     Ayden Férdeline
>     Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
>     On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali
>     <arsenebaguma at gmail.com <mailto:arsenebaguma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a formal poll or are we
>>     just posting on here? ----------------- Arsène Tungali,
>>     about.me/ArseneTungali <http://about.me/ArseneTungali> +243
>>     993810967 <tel:+243%20993%20810%20967> GPG: 523644A0 Goma,
>>     Democratic Republic of Congo Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos) >
>>     On Sep 8, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > >
>>     Re-sending with the attachment. > > Tapani > > ----- Forwarded
>>     message from Paul Rosenzweig ----- > > Dear Tapani (and Farzaneh
>>     as incoming Chair) > > I am writing to request that you consider
>>     endorsing me to be the GNSO > Liaison to the GAC. My current SOI
>>     is here: >
>>     https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI
>>     <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI>
>>     > > My completed application template follows: > > APPLICATION
>>     TEMPLATE > > Name Paul Rosenzweig > Affiliation The Heritage
>>     Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of the NCSG > > Please
>>     provide an overview of your experience/expertise with GNSO policy
>>     > development processes: Since 2014, I have been an active >
>>     member of the CCWG-A in both WS1 and WS2 regarding accountability
>>     mechanisms > related to the ICANN transition. As such I have
>>     participated in the full > gamut of related GNSO/NCSG policy
>>     issue that are of applicability to that > context. Given my legal
>>     background, I have particularly focused on legal > issues -- viz,
>>     ICANN's revised mission statement, the new Independent Review >
>>     Process, and ongoing considerations of jurisdictional issues. I
>>     have been, > and remain, especially focused on areas where the
>>     influence of the GAC seems > to reflect governmental interests
>>     that are inconsistent with GNSO policy. > > Please provide an
>>     overview of your Previous engagements in GNSO work in a >
>>     leadership capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity to
>>     serve in > the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership capacity. This is the
>>     first instance in > which I have volunteered for such a position.
>>     > > Please describe your familiarity with GAC processes,
>>     including GAC > engagement in GNSO policy development: As part of
>>     my work > with the CCWG-A I came to be intimately familiar with
>>     GAC processes for > engaging in GNSO policy development. I
>>     suspect that few in the GNSO have > paid quite as much attention
>>     as I have to the GAC's rules of operation, its > definition of
>>     consensus, and the ways in which it is permitted to influence >
>>     ICANN policy. Indeed the changes to those processes were one of
>>     the > particular focuses of my interest in the CCWG-A and one of
>>     the reasons I was > skeptical of the ultimate product of the CCWG
>>     and the resulting changes to > ICANN's methods for considering
>>     GAC advice. I remain of the view that GAC > engagement in GNSO
>>     policy development is essential but that it should be >
>>     accomplished through established GAC-GNSO liaison procedures and
>>     not through > extra-procedural fiat. By way of example, > I have
>>     been vocal in my view that the GAC's intervention with the Board
>>     > regarding two letter second level top level domains was
>>     procedurally > improper (and also disappointed that the GNSO
>>     liaison to the GAC had not > alerted the GNSO to this issue
>>     earlier. [And, though neutrality is a > hallmark of a good
>>     liaison, I should also make clear that I find GAC claims > that
>>     second level two-letter domains should be restricted deeply >
>>     unpersuasive and antithetical to policies that animate the NCSG
>>     and the > GNSO]. > > Please provide any other information that
>>     demonstrates your qualifications > for this position: It is
>>     perhaps of relevance that I have a > history of service in the US
>>     government and thus a reasonable understanding > of the role of
>>     governments. In the 2005-09 time period I twice served as > the
>>     Acting Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at the
>>     Department > of Homeland Security, and thus experience in
>>     international diplomatic > contexts. I attach a full resume for
>>     your consideration. > > I would be happy to answer any further
>>     questions you or other members of the > NCSG might have. > >
>>     Regards > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch Consulting, PLLC
>>     > 509 C St. NE > Washington, DC 20002 >
>>     paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>>     <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> > O: +1 (202)
>>     547-0660 <tel:+1%20202-547-0660> > M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>>     <tel:+1%20202-329-9650> > VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>>     <tel:+1%20202-738-1739> > www.redbranchconsulting.com
>>     <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com> > www.paulrosenzweigesq.com
>>     <http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com> > My PGP Key: >
>>     https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684
>>     <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684>
>>     > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > >
>>     _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing
>>     list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is> >
>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>     _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing
>>     list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc> 
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-- 


Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170908/a821f0e1/attachment.htm>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list