[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison to the GAC

[Rafik Dammak]

hi Ayden,

yes, we are only reviewing to endorse or not the candidates. the selection
will be done by the GNSO Selection Standing Committee.

Best,

Rafik

2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I believe, to support their
> candidacies — we have not been delegated the responsibility as PC of
> selecting the liaison.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a formal poll or are we just
> posting on here? ----------------- Arsène Tungali, about.me/ArseneTungali +243
> 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967> GPG: 523644A0 Goma, Democratic
> Republic of Congo Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos) > On Sep 8, 2017, at
> 7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > Re-sending with the attachment. > >
> Tapani > > ----- Forwarded message from Paul Rosenzweig ----- > > Dear
> Tapani (and Farzaneh as incoming Chair) > > I am writing to request that
> you consider endorsing me to be the GNSO > Liaison to the GAC. My current
> SOI is here: > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+
> Rosenzweig+SOI > > My completed application template follows: > >
> APPLICATION TEMPLATE > > Name Paul Rosenzweig > Affiliation The Heritage
> Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of the NCSG > > Please provide
> an overview of your experience/expertise with GNSO policy > development
> processes: Since 2014, I have been an active > member of the CCWG-A in both
> WS1 and WS2 regarding accountability mechanisms > related to the ICANN
> transition. As such I have participated in the full > gamut of related
> GNSO/NCSG policy issue that are of applicability to that > context. Given
> my legal background, I have particularly focused on legal > issues -- viz,
> ICANN's revised mission statement, the new Independent Review > Process,
> and ongoing considerations of jurisdictional issues. I have been, > and
> remain, especially focused on areas where the influence of the GAC seems >
> to reflect governmental interests that are inconsistent with GNSO policy. >
> > Please provide an overview of your Previous engagements in GNSO work in a
> > leadership capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity to serve in >
> the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership capacity. This is the first instance in >
> which I have volunteered for such a position. > > Please describe your
> familiarity with GAC processes, including GAC > engagement in GNSO policy
> development: As part of my work > with the CCWG-A I came to be intimately
> familiar with GAC processes for > engaging in GNSO policy development. I
> suspect that few in the GNSO have > paid quite as much attention as I have
> to the GAC's rules of operation, its > definition of consensus, and the
> ways in which it is permitted to influence > ICANN policy. Indeed the
> changes to those processes were one of the > particular focuses of my
> interest in the CCWG-A and one of the reasons I was > skeptical of the
> ultimate product of the CCWG and the resulting changes to > ICANN's methods
> for considering GAC advice. I remain of the view that GAC > engagement in
> GNSO policy development is essential but that it should be > accomplished
> through established GAC-GNSO liaison procedures and not through >
> extra-procedural fiat. By way of example, > I have been vocal in my view
> that the GAC's intervention with the Board > regarding two letter second
> level top level domains was procedurally > improper (and also disappointed
> that the GNSO liaison to the GAC had not > alerted the GNSO to this issue
> earlier. [And, though neutrality is a > hallmark of a good liaison, I
> should also make clear that I find GAC claims > that second level
> two-letter domains should be restricted deeply > unpersuasive and
> antithetical to policies that animate the NCSG and the > GNSO]. > > Please
> provide any other information that demonstrates your qualifications > for
> this position: It is perhaps of relevance that I have a > history of
> service in the US government and thus a reasonable understanding > of the
> role of governments. In the 2005-09 time period I twice served as > the
> Acting Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at the Department > of
> Homeland Security, and thus experience in international diplomatic >
> contexts. I attach a full resume for your consideration. > > I would be
> happy to answer any further questions you or other members of the > NCSG
> might have. > > Regards > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch Consulting,
> PLLC > 509 C St. NE > Washington, DC 20002 > paul.rosenzweig@
> redbranchconsulting.com > O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <+1%20202-547-0660> > M: +1
> (202) 329-9650 <+1%20202-329-9650> > VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
> <+1%20202-738-1739> > www.redbranchconsulting.com >
> www.paulrosenzweigesq.com > My PGP Key: > https://keys.mailvelope.com/
> pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684 > > > > ----- End forwarded
> message ----- > > _______________________________________________ >
> NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170908/251b84a1/attachment.htm>