[NCSG-PC] Statement on content regulation

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Mon Oct 30 11:00:52 EET 2017


Once again, I support the statement.

Stephanie


On 2017-10-30 04:58, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
>
> Support from me.
>
> Tanya
>
>
> On 29/10/17 16:02, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Thanks all, looking to hear from other PC members soon.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-10-29 18:15 GMT+09:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent 
>> <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com <mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>     I support the statement, I even think we could go a little
>>     further and mention the cases we see are live  and concerning us,
>>     like the alternative methods of right protections mechanism  that
>>     some registries/registrar are implementing in new gTLDs, creating
>>     whole mechanism of content control over DNS layer (should the be
>>     free to do it?).
>>
>>     But I have nothing to objection to the letter, I followed it in
>>     NCUC and I think is good.
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Martin
>>
>>     > On Oct 29, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
>>     <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info <mailto:ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>>
>>     wrote:
>>     >
>>     > Fine by me.
>>     >
>>     > Tapani
>>     >
>>     > On Oct 29 15:43, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>) wrote:
>>     >>
>>     >> Hi all,
>>     >>
>>     >> as you may know, there was a statement on content regulation
>>     discussed at
>>     >> NCUC level and there was a suggestion to make it an NCSG statement
>>     >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voPCb3EIi__
>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voPCb3EIi__>
>>     >> umZ1b2RCwkWhyn9wjnLAkiWdenT1dOKo/edit.
>>     >>
>>     >> I would like to ask PC members to review it and get it
>>     endorsed as NCSG
>>     >> comment. if we got consensus around it, we can make a small
>>     edit to replace
>>     >> NCUC occurrences by NCSG. we should get this done within ICANN
>>     meeting in
>>     >> Abu Dhabi since there was initial consultation at NCUC level.
>>     >>
>>     >> as a reminder, we have our policy committee meeting this
>>     afternoon at 17:00.
>>     >>
>>     >> Best,
>>     >>
>>     >> Rafik
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > NCSG-PC mailing list
>>     > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>     > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20171030/fae75302/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list