[NCSG-PC] Statement on content regulation

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

I support the statement, I even think we could go a little further and mention the cases we see are live  and concerning us, like the alternative methods of right protections mechanism  that some registries/registrar are implementing in new gTLDs, creating whole mechanism of content control over DNS layer (should the be free to do it?).

But I have nothing to objection to the letter, I followed it in NCUC and I think is good.

Cheers,
Martin

> On Oct 29, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> 
> Fine by me.
> 
> Tapani
> 
> On Oct 29 15:43, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> as you may know, there was a statement on content regulation discussed at
>> NCUC level and there was a suggestion to make it an NCSG statement
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voPCb3EIi__
>> umZ1b2RCwkWhyn9wjnLAkiWdenT1dOKo/edit.
>> 
>> I would like to ask PC members to review it and get it endorsed as NCSG
>> comment. if we got consensus around it, we can make a small edit to replace
>> NCUC occurrences by NCSG. we should get this done within ICANN meeting in
>> Abu Dhabi since there was initial consultation at NCUC level.
>> 
>> as a reminder, we have our policy committee meeting this afternoon at 17:00.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc