[NCSG-PC] [Draft] Letter to ICANN re: BC and IPC correspondence

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ayden,

Thanks for the draft,
it is important we make a point to voice our concerns and influence the
process. as we discussed before here and on the last call we got 2 problems
1- our representatives in taskforce not being informed 2- the last Data
protection conference (that is already passed)

for the current letter, indeed we should tweak the language there ;) while
we keep the substance. reading IPC letter, it seems they reject the use
case matrix and I understood from previous comments you think that
doesn't include our perspective. I add few comments but I think we can add
more, in particular, our concerns in general regarding the process and not
just responding to BC and IPC requests.

I ask other PC members to review the letter and share their thoughts. I put
the GDPR as a discussion item for today call. We need a deadline to get
this done and prior to Abud Dhabi meeting if we may want to continue the
discussion there and depending on how things go with the cross-community
session. I propose that we reach a new version by this Friday.

Best,

Rafik

2017-10-08 23:07 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have drafted a letter to ICANN in response to the recent correspondence
> received from the BC and the IPC. You can read/edit it here.
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13ujYOpJFL0eNvjQCiNmsduFFbiUPQC5Wmbe9wHC2K6Q/edit?usp=sharing>
> I know the language is provocative (intentionally so), but this is a first
> draft -- and if you disapprove please provide alternative language.
>
> Best, Ayden
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20171010/e4a75cb0/attachment.htm>