[NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Review&Endorsment

[Stephanie Perrin]

I agree with the principle Ed is raising here, and I think it is 
important. However, I don't really want to annoy the CCNSO at this point 
(for reasons related to the RDS consultation going on right now), not 
that anyone really takes our comments all that seriously.  Perhaps we 
could phrase it gently, pointing out that this is an important principle 
and there has to be an extremely important reason to flout it? (sorry 
have not got into the google doc yet....)

stephanie


On 2017-05-19 06:50, Edward Morris wrote:
> Rafik, Matt, Ayden, all,
> I've put together an opposition comment for consideration for support, 
> improvement and submission.
> I'm on the road and am having great difficulty uploading to Google 
> docs. I've attached the comment to this e-mail as a Word doc. If 
> someone could kindly upload this proposed comment to create a Google 
> doc for editing purposes I'd be appreciative. A reminder that the 
> deadline for submission is 23:59 UTC tonight.
> Thanks again to Arshad for all of his work on the comment.
> Kind Regards,
> Ed Morris
> Sent from my iPhone
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Matthew Shears" <matthew at intpolicy.com>
> *Sent*: Friday, May 19, 2017 10:46 AM
> *To*: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "Ayden Férdeline" 
> <icann at ferdeline.com>
> *Cc*: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
> *Subject*: Re: [NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / 
> Review&Endorsment
>
> Ed made some valuable comments on this in a recent e-mail that I 
> cannot put my finger on at the moment.
>
> On 19/05/2017 11:11, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi Ayden,
>> If we have overwhelming support for opposing the deferral, we would 
>> need a new comment. Anyone wants to volunteer for the drafting?
>> Best.
>> Rafik
>> On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com 
>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>     My initial reaction is, I do not support the postponement of
>>     mandatory Reviews. If there is a compelling reason for why this
>>     should happen, I would be interested in hearing it.
>>
>>     Many thanks,
>>     Ayden
>>>     -------- Original Message --------
>>>     Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral /
>>>     Review&Endorsment
>>>     Local Time: May 19, 2017 12:52 AM
>>>     UTC Time: May 18, 2017 11:52 PM
>>>     From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>     To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>     I am sharing here the draft made by Arshad about ccNSO review
>>>     deferral
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing
>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing>.
>>>
>>>     I understand that Ed objected to the content and explained his
>>>     point of view on NCSG mailing list
>>>     https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=NCSG-DISCUSS;9ee80ad7.1705
>>>     <https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=NCSG-DISCUSS;9ee80ad7.1705>
>>>     .
>>>     I need to hear from others about their positions and also any
>>>     suggestion on how to accommodate the 2 opposite views in the
>>>     NCSG comment i.e what can be the consensual position for NCSG here.
>>>     the deadline for submission is also the 19th May and so we have
>>>     less than 24hours to review and suggest a way to move forward.
>>>     Best,
>>>     Rafik
>>>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>     From: *Rafik Dammak* <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>     Date: 2017-05-17 11:38 GMT+09:00
>>>     Subject: Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Consultation
>>>     To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>>     <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>"
>>>     <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>>     <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>>, ncsg-pc
>>>     <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>     Arshad kindly drafted and shared his draft for NCSG comment
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing
>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing>.
>>>
>>>     Please review it, add your comments, express your support or not
>>>     in order to assess what we have the common NCSG position on this
>>>     topics and submitting in time. the deadline for submission is
>>>     this Friday 19th May.
>>>     Best.
>>>     Rafik
>>
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> -- 
> Matthew Shears
> matthew at intpolicy.com
> +447712472987
> Skype:mshears
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170519/5e6ffab7/attachment.htm>