[NCSG-PC] [DRAFT] Slides for Ideation Workshop

[Ayden Férdeline]

Hi Rafik,

Thanks for your question. I would like this workshop to be something that any of our members can participate in, without having any background on the topic, while still being able to shape and contribute to the final output (being the comment itself). This obviously requires some structure to be useful. So in the first 20 minutes we will introduce new stimuli and triggers to excite people’s brains, and then turn the conversation over to them to share their thoughts. I will facilitate through open-ended questions and revise the comment after the call to take into account the input that is gathered.

So I see this as a consultation session to understand the perspectives of those who participate on the call, and not outreach in any form. I'm not looking to provide people with reading material or a longer term commitment, because I don't think that is what we need on this issue. It's just a one hour call to gather views and to try to make the comment a bit more representative of the views of our members. Ideally I would run this exercise multiple times with different participants in different time zones... but for now this is just a pilot to see if it works. Does this make more sense?

Thanks, Ayden

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [DRAFT] Slides for Ideation Workshop
Local Time: May 19, 2017 7:34 AM
UTC Time: May 19, 2017 6:34 AM
From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>

Hi Ayden,

Thanks for sharing this.

definitely, it doesn't look like an austere presentation :) can you add the end as annex maybe some references and links for those who to read more and look for details?
btw why you are conceiving this as ideation, while it is about a public comment. maybe elaborating more about the goal?

Best,

Rafik

2017-05-19 0:35 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
Hi all,

Here are some draft slides for the ideation workshop on 29 May to try to collect feedback from NCSG participants on the WhoIs conflicts with law comment. These are incomplete and will change, but if you have any edits/thoughts it would be great to receive them. I'm hoping to spend no more than 20 minutes on the background, and to leave 30 minutes for brainstorming, idea harvesting, and so forth. What do you think?

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_IHTu1GKghkBXAxdM3r82s6gJyt8HQ6MYpH-j5Rtp4k/edit?usp=sharing

Thanks, Ayden

_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170519/7c3ea8bf/attachment.htm>