[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review

[matthew shears]

Hi all

I am conscious of the impending deadline for these comments (tomorrow).  
I recognize that Ayden has put time and thought into proposing comments 
for NCSG's consideration.   This said, we have had no substantive 
discussion of these comments and their merit on the list or in the PC, 
nor have we had, realistically, sufficient time to do so.   Because of 
this I do not feel that I, as a member of the PC, can endorse these 
comments for NCSG.

The NCSG PC should have a  better process in place for ensuring that 
there is time to do so in the future and we will, hopefully, be 
rectifying this promptly.

Matthew


On 23/03/2017 11:33, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Hello PC
>
> Teeing this up as comments are due tomorrow.  Please review these 
> suggested inputs carefully.
>
> Related docs can be found here.
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01-en
>
> Your thoughts/suggestions in the google doc (below) are appreciated asap.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Matthew
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review
> Date: 	Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:52:33 -0400
> From: 	Ayden F?rdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM>
> Reply-To: 	Ayden F?rdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> To: 	NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I have drafted up on Google Docs 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing> 
> some comments on behalf of the NCSG regarding the Review of the 
> At-Large community. This is a really rough draft, and I'd welcome your 
> feedback on what arguments should be refined, what I might have 
> missed, or what we might want to remain silent on. I'm not happy with 
> it at the moment, but I figured it would be better to get some words 
> down onto paper, and we can refine this together... so please take a 
> read of the proposed statement here 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>, 
> with the understanding that it's definitely a work-in-progress. And 
> please share your thoughts, either in the document itself or on this 
> mailing list!
>
> Comments are due in three days, so we don't have too long to get this 
> together unfortunately. You can read the draft report here 
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf> (PDF 
> link) if you haven't seen it already.
>
> /A friendly note to those ALAC members who read the NCSG mailing list: 
> this statement is a work-in-progress, it has not been endorsed yet by 
> the NCSG Policy Committee, and it will likely change between now and 
> the time it is submitted (if it is submitted)./
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden F?rdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>

-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20170323/aa8b65c9/attachment-0001.html>