[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi All, At our PC meeting in Copenhagen, various people volunteered to 
work on comments (hooray!).

Later, others came up to join them. I've shared this list with Stefania 
(our comments shepherd), and let me share them with you:

_ICANN Public Comments
_1. IGO-INGO - Martin (lead), Haoran Huang (new member, 
huaghaoran940419 at bupt.edu.cn), Kathy
2. At Large Review - Ayden (lead), Kathy
3. Consumer Trust Review Team (50 recommendations!) - Anna (lead), Kathy 
with Carlos as advisor (since he's on the Review Team)
4. Finance - not certain about this one, but I think Ed, Rafik and Ayden 
volunteered.

_Working Groups comments (requests go out for input on various issues 
from time to time during the PDP process):_

1. Registration Directory Services - Stephanie (lead), Ayden and Stefania

2. Rights Protection Mechanisms - Martin (lead), Anna, Grace and Ines 
with Kathy as advisor (since she's a co-chair)
3. Subsequent Procedures - Matt Shears (I think he wants to be the 
lead), Anna, Stefania, Marilia (I think) with Avri as advisor (since 
she's a co-chair)

Best, Kathy

On 3/23/2017 7:33 AM, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Hello PC
>
> Teeing this up as comments are due tomorrow.  Please review these 
> suggested inputs carefully.
>
> Related docs can be found here.
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01-en
>
> Your thoughts/suggestions in the google doc (below) are appreciated asap.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Matthew
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review
> Date: 	Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:52:33 -0400
> From: 	Ayden F?rdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM>
> Reply-To: 	Ayden F?rdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> To: 	NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I have drafted up on Google Docs 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing> 
> some comments on behalf of the NCSG regarding the Review of the 
> At-Large community. This is a really rough draft, and I'd welcome your 
> feedback on what arguments should be refined, what I might have 
> missed, or what we might want to remain silent on. I'm not happy with 
> it at the moment, but I figured it would be better to get some words 
> down onto paper, and we can refine this together... so please take a 
> read of the proposed statement here 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>, 
> with the understanding that it's definitely a work-in-progress. And 
> please share your thoughts, either in the document itself or on this 
> mailing list!
>
> Comments are due in three days, so we don't have too long to get this 
> together unfortunately. You can read the draft report here 
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf> (PDF 
> link) if you haven't seen it already.
>
> /A friendly note to those ALAC members who read the NCSG mailing list: 
> this statement is a work-in-progress, it has not been endorsed yet by 
> the NCSG Policy Committee, and it will likely change between now and 
> the time it is submitted (if it is submitted)./
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden F?rdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20170323/39252f92/attachment.html>