[NCSG-PC] IGO-INGO comment due in three days

[Ayden Férdeline]

That sounds like a good start, Martín. I think we should try to submit something, even if we do have to lodge the response a few days past the deadline [which is in four hours time].

Best wishes,
Ayden

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:42 pm, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:
I don't have a draft done for this, but we could try to address this in the informal non comercial RPM group to have a quick inside before it close.

Cheers,
Martin

On 30 Mar 2017 17:56, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

Hi,

Just following up as comments are due today. Is anyone working on this? And what do we think about recommendation #5, that IGOs and INGOs have access to the UDRP and URS "at no or nominal cost"?

Ayden

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NCSG-PC] IGO-INGO comment due in three days
Local Time: 27 March 2017 3:51 PM
UTC Time: 27 March 2017 14:51
From: icann at ferdeline.com
To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>

Hi,

Just a reminder that comments on the Initial Report from the PDP WG that is evaluating IGO and INGO's access to curative rights protection mechanisms are due in three days, on 30 March. Do we have a response in progress?

Best wishes,

Ayden

______________________________ _________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170330/a58a6157/attachment.htm>