[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for confirmation of members - GNSO Standing Selection Committee

Mon Mar 20 21:27:06 EET 2017

This is a decision of the NCSG PC.  It is a matter before the NCSG PC.  I suggest we allow the NCSG PC to handle this as has been its practice and pursuant to the PC Chair’s guidance.  

I would not be in favor of turning NCSG decisions over to constituencies as suggested below.  The SG and C have separate roles and responsibilities and this proposal muddies those waters in dangerous and slippery ways.

Thanks,
Robin

> On Mar 20, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ayden,
> 
> First to your second point: there're indeed three slots for NCSG, but
> originally it was proposed one per constituency. The argument that won
> us the third slot was that we have members who belong to neither as
> well as many who belong to both constituencies. It could have been one
> per constituency plus one non-constituency-tied slot for NCSG as well,
> and I think it was mainly due to lack of time that the decision was
> made to leave it up to the NCSG to pick three as a SG.
> 
> With that history, I think we should give each constituency at least
> one slot in any case (as long as they have a volunteer, and both do).
> 
> As for calling for volunteers on the -discuss list, I'm not sure it'd
> be necessary, as the nature of the job is such that it's hardly
> suitable for newcomers - while there's no formal requirement, I tend
> to think councillors and PC members should be preferred. And time is
> short. But you are welcome to spread the word in whichever way you
> want, of course.
> 
> As to who decides, generally the Policy Committee is responsible for
> NCSG appointments. In this case we could even let each constituency
> formally pick theirs and leave only the 3rd to be decided by the PC,
> but if we can agree that there should be a representative from each
> constituency, I think it'd be fine to let the PC choose all three.
> 
> As for how candidates would be assessed, we have no time to set up
> proper formal criteria. As per above, I would suggest
> (1) at least one per constituency;
> (2) preference given to councillors, PC members and former councillors;
> (3) look at the council decision for necessary qualifications.
> 
> But in the end we'll just have to discuss alternatives and if
> necessary vote within the PC.
> 
> Tapani
> 
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:05:26PM -0400, Ayden Férdeline (icann at ferdeline.com) wrote:
> 
>> An internal deadline makes sense - and I'm glad it is still a few days away, as I have heard off-list from one NCUC member that they are considering putting their name forward. I will communicate this internal deadline to them. Might it be worth considering sending a call for nominations to the general NCSG list?
>> 
>> I also note that the three slots are allocated to the NCSG, not to the NCUC or to NPOC. In the event that there are four or more nominations for the three slots, who is responsible for selecting our representatives, and how will the candidates be assessed?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ayden
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for confirmation of members - GNSO Standing Selection Committee
>> Local Time: 20 March 2017 4:22 PM
>> UTC Time: 20 March 2017 16:22
>> From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
>> To: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is
>> 
>> Thank you Martin.
>> 
>> That leaves us with the confortable situation of three volunteers for
>> three positions, if I understood correctly that Avri isn't available:
>> 
>> Poncelet, Ed and Rafik.
>> 
>> There's still time though if someone else wants to volunteer or
>> nominate someone, but not much.
>> 
>> Given that council's deadline is Monday, 27 March, let's make our
>> internal deadline Thursday, 23 March, at 23:59 UTC.
>> 
>> That leaves us Friday and the weekend to make our decision in case
>> more candidates show up.
>> 
>> Tapani
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:06:33PM -0300, Martin Pablo Silva Valent (mpsilvavalent at gmail.com) wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> I confirm that NPOCs will support Poncelet's nomination. He is been a long
>>> time in icann and has high moral sense of integrity.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Martin Silva
>>> 
>>> On 17 Mar 2017 08:06, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I will be glad to volunteer for the SSC.
>>>> I had experience in selection, reviewing applications etc with
>>>> ICANN nomcom when I was NCUC representative there.
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Rafik
>>>> 
>>>> 2017-03-16 22:53 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> See below. We need to appoint three (3) members to the SSC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Deadline is March 27 - there's not much time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Suggestions, volunteers?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tapani
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Forwarded message from Nathalie Peregrine <
>>>>> nathalie.peregrine at icann.org> -----
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 15 March, the GNSO Council adopted the charter for the GNSO
>>>>> Standing Selection Committee (SSC) – see
>>>>> https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/draft-standing-selection-
>>>>> committee-15mar17-en.pdf[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.
>>>>> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_drafts_
>>>>> draft-2Dstanding-2Dselection-2Dcommittee-2D15mar17-2Den.pdf&
>>>>> d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=
>>>>> PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSD
>>>>> zgqG&m=KmYsfcYHwH-JYXWIJ58L-ZnwETFBe1FrVJ8qghEsRV8&s=GmTt0n-
>>>>> 0Bp3olHk5awt9BtmGRrEZnY7TI9fF4Fnvcy4&e=>.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The SSC is tasked, as requested by the GNSO Council, to 1), where
>>>>> applicable, prepare and issue calls for applications related to the
>>>>> selection or nomination of candidates for ICANN structures such as
>>>>> ICANN review teams as well as structures related to the Empowered
>>>>> Community, 2) review and evaluate all relevant applicants/candidates,
>>>>> 3) rank candidates and make selection/appointment recommendations for
>>>>> review and approval by Council and 4) communicate selections to all
>>>>> interested parties.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The membership structure of the SSC is as follows:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The SSC shall consist of a total of 9 members appointed as follows:
>>>>> - One member appointed by each Stakeholder Group of the
>>>>> Contracted Party House;
>>>>> - One member appointed respectively from each of the Business
>>>>> Constituency, the Intellectual Property Constituency, and the Internet
>>>>> Service Providers and Connectivity Providers Constituency;
>>>>> - Three members appointed by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder
>>>>> Group; and,
>>>>> - One member from one of the three Nominating-Committee
>>>>> appointees to the GNSO Council.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The GNSO Council has tasked the SSC to carry out the review and
>>>>> selection of GNSO endorsed candidates for the Registration Directory
>>>>> Service Review Team for Council consideration at the latest by its 20
>>>>> April 2017 meeting. Furthermore, the GNSO Council has tasked the SSC
>>>>> to develop the criteria and the process for the selection of the GNSO
>>>>> Representative to the Empowered Community for GNSO Council
>>>>> consideration by its June 2017 meeting.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your respective groups are requested to communicate their member(s) to
>>>>> the SSC to the GNSO Secretariat
>>>>> (gnso-secs at icann.org)<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org)> by 27 March at the
>>>>> latest. A first meeting of the SSC will be scheduled for Thursday 30
>>>>> March at 16.00 UTC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marika Konings
>>>>> Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
>>>>> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc