[NCSG-PC] Reminder Agenda for PC meeting / Sunday 12th March 17:00 Copehangen
matthew shears
mshears at cdt.org
Sat Mar 11 18:11:45 EET 2017
Hi Rafik - for this meeting if we have time or perhaps JOBURG
I think - as the WS2 work starts to complete (hopefully) - that we need
to have a discussion about the prioritization of policy work to ensure
that we have as best coverage and engagement as possible - hopefully
including some resource shift from WS2 to PDPs.
Matthew
On 11/03/2017 17:04, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am sending a reminder about the draft agenda for tomorrow meeting.
> Please share your comments.
>
> Best.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
> Date: Mar 7, 2017 8:44 AM
> Subject: Agenda for PC meeting / Sunday 12th March 17:00 Copehangen
> To: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>>
> Cc:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> as I shared in a previous email, we have to plan for our policy
> committee session this Sunday.
>
> as draft agenda and open for discussion and amendments:
>
> 1- Review of GNSO council agenda
> - Motions discussions/voting
> 2- Topics for discussions:
> - Board seat election: process and timeline
> - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the Saturday sessions
> - Workstream 2: any reports from full-day meeting
> - meeting with Data Protection Commissioners prep (TBC)
> - Public consultation: any statement from NCSG
> 3- AOB
>
> We should have action items to follow-up those discussions.
>
> if we cannot cover all topics, we may meet informally during the
> week and take notes of our discussions, sharing them in PC list
> for record. We also have NCSG CD and I would like to ask Tapani
> if we can cover remaining topics in that day without jeopardizing
> other agenda topics.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> for reference I copied the Council agenda below:
>
> **
>
> *Item 1. Administrative Matters (5 mins)*
>
> 1.1 - Roll Call
>
> 1.2 - Updates to Statements of Interest
>
> 1.3 - Review / Amend Agenda
>
> 1.4 - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meetings
> per the GNSO Operating Procedures:
>
> Minutes of the meeting of the GNSO Council on 19 January 2017,
> posted on 10 February 2017.
>
> Minutes of the meeting of the GNSO Council on 16 February 2017,
> will be posted on 8 March 2017.
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Item 2. Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)*
>
> 2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key
> themes / topics, to include review of Projects List
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project>and Action Item List
> <https://community.icann.org/x/RgZlAg>
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *
> *
>
> *Item 3. Consent Agenda (10 mins)*
>
> **
>
> *3.1 – Confirmation of GNSO Co-Chair for the Cross Community
> Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds*
>
> In November 2016, the GNSO Council had approved the Charter for
> the new Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on New gTLD Auction
> Proceeds and appointed Jonathan Robinson as the GNSO co-chair to
> the group in December 2016
> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20161215-1
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20161215-1>). On 9
> February 2017, Jonathan Robinson informed the CCWG and the Council
> that he will be stepping down as GNSO co-chair, and requested that
> the Council appoint a successor as soon as is reasonably possible
> (http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/2017-February/000080.html
> <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/2017-February/000080.html>).
> As directed by the Council following its meeting on 16 February,
> staff issued a Call for Volunteers on 1 March
> (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019785.html
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019785.html>).
> Councilor Erika Mann responded to the Call and volunteered her
> services
> (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019786.html
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019786.html>)
> Here the Council will discuss and, if appropriate, approve Erika’s
> candidacy for appointment as the new GNSO co-chair to this CCWG.
>
> **
>
> *Item 4. COUNCIL VOTE – Approval of Charter for a New GNSO
> Standing Selection Committee (15 minutes)*
>
> On 13 December 2016, Councilors Susan Kawaguchi and Ed Morris
> circulated for the Council’s consideration a draft document
> proposing a set of criteria and a uniform process for the
> selection of GNSO representatives to future Review Teams,
> including for the various reviews mandated by the ICANN Bylaws,
> and other ICANN structures for which the GNSO will need to
> appoint, nominate or endorse candidates
> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-appointments-procedure-13dec16-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-appointments-procedure-13dec16-en.pdf>).
> Following further work on the draft document by Susan, Ed and the
> Council leadership, a proposed Charter to create a GNSO Standing
> Selection Committee that will conduct future selections based on
> agreed, uniform criteria and a documented process was circulated
> to the Council on 6 February 2017
> (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-February/019734.html)
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-February/019734.html%29> and
> discussed at the Council meeting on 16 February. Here the Council
> is expected to complete its discussions on the remaining open
> items regarding the draft Charter, and vote on a motion to create
> the new GNSO Standing Selection Committee.
>
> If the new Committee is established, its initial tasks are
> expected to include proposing a slate of GNSO nominees for the
> upcoming Registration Directory Services and Accountability and
> Transparency Review Teams, as well as possibly assisting with the
> proposed establishment of a Standing Panel for Independent Review
> Processes (see Agenda Item 6, below).
>
> 4.1 – Presentation of motion (James Bladel)
> https://community.icann.org/x/lJvRAw
> <https://community.icann.org/x/lJvRAw>
>
> 4.2 – Council and community discussion
>
> 4.3 – Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority)
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Item 5. COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Updated Charter for the Cross
> Community Working Group on Internet Governance (20 minutes)*
>
> At its Public Meeting at ICANN57 in Hyderabad, India, on 7
> November 2016, the GNSO Council had approved a motion conditioning
> the future participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization
> of the CCWG on Internet Governance (CCWG-IG) upon a comprehensive
> review of the group’s Charter by the CCWG-IG, in accordance with
> the Framework of Uniform Principles for CCWGs that had been
> adopted recently by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils
> (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf>).
> In its resolution, the GNSO Council had noted that the CCWG-IG’s
> future work is expected to be subject to a clear work plan, with
> regular updates and clear deliverables, and had requested that, by
> ICANN58, the CCWG-IG was to report on its findings, which report
> may include a revised charter or a recommendation to reconstitute
> the group under a new structure
> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions - 20161107-3
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20161107-3>).
>
> Here the Council will receive an update and report from the
> CCWG-IG co-chairs, and discuss next steps in relation to the
> GNSO’s continued participation as a Chartering Organization of
> this CCWG.
>
> 5.1 – Update and report (CCWG-IG co-chairs)
>
> 5.2 – Council and community discussion
>
> 5.3 – Next steps
>
> **
>
> *Item 6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Activities of the
> CCWG-Accountability Independent Review Process Implementation
> Oversight Team (15 minutes)*
>
> On 28 February 2017, the Independent Review Process Implementation
> Oversight Team (IRP IOT) of the ongoing CCWG-Accountability
> informed all ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory
> Committees (SO/ACs) that SO/ACs will shortly be expected to work
> with ICANN to establish a Standing Panel for future IRPs brought
> under the revised ICANN Bylaws
> (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019790.html
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-March/019790.html>)
> This is a four-step process that needs to be completed in order
> for the newly-constituted IRP under the revised ICANN Bylaws to be
> used. Here the Council will receive an update from the GNSO’s
> participants in the IRP IOT, and discuss next steps in relation to
> this request and any additional actions that are expected to be
> forthcoming in the near term for the GNSO Council and community.
>
> 6.1 – Update and report (CCWG-Accountability IRT IOT representatives)
>
> 6.2 – Council and community discussion
>
> 6.3 – Next steps
>
> **
>
> *Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Proposed Council Request in relation
> to Letter from Thick WHOIS Implementation Review Team (10 minutes)*
>
> On 15 December 2016, the Thick WHOIS Implementation Review Team
> (IRT) sent a letter to the GNSO Council describing a number of
> privacy law developments and how the IRT has considered them
> (seehttps://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/irt-to-gnso-council-15dec16-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/irt-to-gnso-council-15dec16-en.pdf>).
> The letter noted that the IRT’s implementation plan has been
> published for public comment (see
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-implementation-gnso-thick-rdds-whois-transition-2016-10-26-en
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-implementation-gnso-thick-rdds-whois-transition-2016-10-26-en>)
> and that the IRT does not currently expect the developments in
> question to affect the timeline for transition to thick WHOIS. The
> Council discussed the letter at its meeting on 19 January 2017, at
> which Councilors Erika Mann and Michele Neylon volunteered to
> draft a possible response to the IRT from the Council for Council
> consideration. On 2 February 2017, Councilor Erika Mann circulated
> a draft Council request for an update on the legal review that had
> been done previously
> (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-February/019729.html
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2017-February/019729.html>).
> Here the Council will continue its discussion of the draft request
> with a view toward deciding on its further actions on this topic,
> including whether and when to request the update, and whether the
> scope of the request (if one is to be sent) should remain
> unchanged from the previous legal review.
>
> 7.1 – Status summary (Council Chairs and Erika Mann)
>
> 7.2 – Council and community discussion
>
> 7.3 – Next steps
>
> **
>
> *Item 8: JOINT DISCUSSION – Meeting with ICANN’s Global Domains
> Division (30 minutes)*
>
> **
>
> At previous ICANN Public Meetings, the GNSO Council and community
> had held regular discussion sessions with senior staff from
> ICANN’s Global Domains Division (GDD). This section of the
> Council’s Public Meeting at ICANN58 has been added to allow the
> GNSO community to interact with GDD senior staff, to discuss
> topics of current interest to the GNSO.
>
> 8.1 – Introductions (Council Chairs and GDD senior staff)
>
> 8.2 – Open discussion
>
> **
>
> *Item 9: OPEN MICROPHONE & ANY OTHER BUSINESS (5 minutes)*
>
> **
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
--
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170311/7a0d2947/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list