[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts…

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thanks for sharing this, Stephanie. I have revised [our draft comment](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing) to cite their excellent proposal. I have not added any text to our comment re: binding corporate rules or EWG recommendations as I do not myself have the knowledge to expand upon these points.

Best wishes, Ayden

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts?
Local Time: June 3, 2017 4:24 PM
UTC Time: June 3, 2017 3:24 PM
From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
To: NCSG-Policy <pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>

I think this is an excellent response to the WHOIS conflicts procedure, and I wrote and told them so, indicating that I will recommend to NCSG that we cite their proposal and support it. I will of course add to ours a chunk on the EWG recommendation that ICANN draft a privacy policy that matches global requirements, and consider binding corporate rules (which when cited in the contracts would require better enforcement among contracted parties of the behaviour of their resellers.)

cheers Stephanie

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:	Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts?
Date:	Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:51:28 -0400
From:	Christopher Wilkinson [<cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>](mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu)
To:	Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [<ocl at gih.com>](mailto:ocl at gih.com), ELEEZA AGOPIAN [<Eleeza.agopian at icann.org>](mailto:Eleeza.agopian at icann.org)
CC:	Annette M?hlberg [<annette.muehlberg at verdi.de>](mailto:annette.muehlberg at verdi.de), Andrei Kolesnikov [<andrei at rol.ru>](mailto:andrei at rol.ru), WOLF LUDWIG [<wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net>](mailto:wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net), Schweighofer Erich [<erich.schweighofer at univie.ac.at>](mailto:erich.schweighofer at univie.ac.at), YRJO LANSIPURO [<yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com>](mailto:yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com)

Good morning:

Please find attached the DRAFT Rev2 of the proposed submission.
I have included redrafting from Annette and Erich (lightly edited).
Subject to Olivier's agreement, may I ask Eleeza to repost the new draft to the Wiki.

Many thanks to you all for improvements, comments and support. I trust that this will now fly with EURALO and with ALAC.

Best regards

Christopher

On 01 Jun 2017, at 22:44, Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:

Eric, Annette:

Thankyou both. I expect to have a little time tomorrow morning to do a final review before leaving to Edinburgh for the weekend.

- I intended the text to be assimmilable to the whole of ALAC, thus did not focus only on the EU;

- For the 'block exemption', that idea was clearly drawn from EU practice, and I still think that it would be a valid fallback for the EU R&Rs should all else fail.
But I think ALAC owes it to the rest of the world to do something more significant, thus the 'best practice' option.

I take it that our At Large leadership would take it on from here, including the aspects arising from the (generally little known) proposals for a successor to the WHOIS protocol.
(There is an acronym here that I have forgotten)

Good night

C.

On 01 Jun 2017, at 21:56, Schweighofer Erich <erich.schweighofer at univie.ac.at> wrote:
<170500_ICANN EuRALO_DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION_AM_ES.odt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20170613/a22bd837/attachment.html>