From stephanie.perrin Sat Jun 3 18:28:38 2017 From: stephanie.perrin (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:28:38 -0400 Subject: [PC-NCSG] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Re=3A_DRAFT_REV2_ALAC_response_to_ICAN?= =?utf-8?q?N_Procedure_for_handling_Whois_conflicts=E2=80=A6?= In-Reply-To: <65E028E1-4B63-4C32-A579-0184DABC7629@christopherwilkinson.eu> References: <65E028E1-4B63-4C32-A579-0184DABC7629@christopherwilkinson.eu> Message-ID: I think this is an excellent response to the WHOIS conflicts procedure, and I wrote and told them so, indicating that I will recommend to NCSG that we cite their proposal and support it. I will of course add to ours a chunk on the EWG recommendation that ICANN draft a privacy policy that matches global requirements, and consider binding corporate rules (which when cited in the contracts would require better enforcement among contracted parties of the behaviour of their resellers.) cheers Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts? Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:51:28 -0400 From: Christopher Wilkinson To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond , ELEEZA AGOPIAN CC: Annette M?hlberg , Andrei Kolesnikov , WOLF LUDWIG , Schweighofer Erich , YRJO LANSIPURO Good morning: Please find attached the DRAFT Rev2 of the proposed submission. I have included redrafting from Annette and Erich (lightly edited). Subject to Olivier's agreement, may I ask Eleeza to repost the new draft to the Wiki. Many thanks to you all for improvements, comments and support. I trust that this will now fly with EURALO and with ALAC. Best regards Christopher On 01 Jun 2017, at 22:44, Christopher Wilkinson > wrote: > Eric, Annette: > > Thankyou both. I expect to have a little time tomorrow morning to do a > final review before leaving to Edinburgh for the weekend. > > -I intended the text to be /assimmilable /to the whole of ALAC, thus > did not focus only on the EU; > > -For the 'block exemption', that idea was clearly drawn from EU > practice, and I still think that it would be a valid fallback for the > EU R&Rs should all else fail. > But I think ALAC owes it to the rest of the world to do something more > significant, thus the 'best practice' option. > > I take it that our At Large leadership would take it on from here, > including the aspects arising from the (generally little known) > proposals for a successor to the WHOIS protocol. > (There is an acronym here that I have forgotten) > > Good night > > C. > > > On 01 Jun 2017, at 21:56, Schweighofer Erich > > wrote: > >> <170500_ICANN EuRALO_DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION_AM_ES.odt> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DRAFT REV 2 - 170500_ICANN EuRALO_DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION.odt Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text Size: 14864 bytes Desc: not available URL: From icann Wed Jun 14 01:11:51 2017 From: icann (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:11:51 -0400 Subject: [PC-NCSG] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Re=3A_DRAFT_REV2_ALAC_response_to_ICAN?= =?utf-8?q?N_Procedure_for_handling_Whois_conflicts=E2=80=A6?= In-Reply-To: References: <65E028E1-4B63-4C32-A579-0184DABC7629@christopherwilkinson.eu> Message-ID: Thanks for sharing this, Stephanie. I have revised [our draft comment](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing) to cite their excellent proposal. I have not added any text to our comment re: binding corporate rules or EWG recommendations as I do not myself have the knowledge to expand upon these points. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts? Local Time: June 3, 2017 4:24 PM UTC Time: June 3, 2017 3:24 PM From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca To: NCSG-Policy I think this is an excellent response to the WHOIS conflicts procedure, and I wrote and told them so, indicating that I will recommend to NCSG that we cite their proposal and support it. I will of course add to ours a chunk on the EWG recommendation that ICANN draft a privacy policy that matches global requirements, and consider binding corporate rules (which when cited in the contracts would require better enforcement among contracted parties of the behaviour of their resellers.) cheers Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: DRAFT REV2 ALAC response to ICANN Procedure for handling Whois conflicts? Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:51:28 -0400 From: Christopher Wilkinson [](mailto:cw at christopherwilkinson.eu) To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [](mailto:ocl at gih.com), ELEEZA AGOPIAN [](mailto:Eleeza.agopian at icann.org) CC: Annette M?hlberg [](mailto:annette.muehlberg at verdi.de), Andrei Kolesnikov [](mailto:andrei at rol.ru), WOLF LUDWIG [](mailto:wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net), Schweighofer Erich [](mailto:erich.schweighofer at univie.ac.at), YRJO LANSIPURO [](mailto:yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com) Good morning: Please find attached the DRAFT Rev2 of the proposed submission. I have included redrafting from Annette and Erich (lightly edited). Subject to Olivier's agreement, may I ask Eleeza to repost the new draft to the Wiki. Many thanks to you all for improvements, comments and support. I trust that this will now fly with EURALO and with ALAC. Best regards Christopher On 01 Jun 2017, at 22:44, Christopher Wilkinson wrote: Eric, Annette: Thankyou both. I expect to have a little time tomorrow morning to do a final review before leaving to Edinburgh for the weekend. - I intended the text to be assimmilable to the whole of ALAC, thus did not focus only on the EU; - For the 'block exemption', that idea was clearly drawn from EU practice, and I still think that it would be a valid fallback for the EU R&Rs should all else fail. But I think ALAC owes it to the rest of the world to do something more significant, thus the 'best practice' option. I take it that our At Large leadership would take it on from here, including the aspects arising from the (generally little known) proposals for a successor to the WHOIS protocol. (There is an acronym here that I have forgotten) Good night C. On 01 Jun 2017, at 21:56, Schweighofer Erich wrote: <170500_ICANN EuRALO_DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION_AM_ES.odt> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Thu Jun 1 11:50:34 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:50:34 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: [Internet Policy] OHCHR - call for inputs on civil society participation in multilateral institutions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just forwarding this call for inputs along: do we think this is something that the NCSG (or the NCUC or NPOC) should comment on, based on our experiences within ICANN, or would it fall too far outside our remit? Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Internet Policy] OHCHR - call for inputs on civil society participation in multilateral institutions Local Time: May 31, 2017 8:43 PM UTC Time: May 31, 2017 7:43 PM From: nashton at consensus.pro To: ISOC policy List Dear all, I think several of you will be interested in the below: Call for inputs Report of High Commissioner for Human Rights on "Civil society space in multilateral institutions" Deadline extended 30 September 2017 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_iBozXNIJQyrGBtFaWnMjMrqbHwgMWn4ZvpRH1tDJVY/edit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Thu Jun 1 18:02:24 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:02:24 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: [Internet Policy] OHCHR - call for inputs on civil society participation in multilateral institutions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3423f759-62b9-a6a0-5d89-4cd285bfee24@mail.utoronto.ca> we would be nuts not to respond to this IMHO Stephanie On 2017-06-01 04:50, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Just forwarding this call for inputs along: do we think this is > something that the NCSG (or the NCUC or NPOC) should comment on, based > on our experiences within ICANN, or would it fall too far outside our > remit? > > Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [Internet Policy] OHCHR - call for inputs on civil society >> participation in multilateral institutions >> Local Time: May 31, 2017 8:43 PM >> UTC Time: May 31, 2017 7:43 PM >> From: nashton at consensus.pro >> To: ISOC policy List >> >> Dear all, >> >> I think several of you will be interested in the below: >> >> *Call for inputs* >> *Report of High Commissioner for Human Rights on* >> *"Civil society space in multilateral institutions"* >> *Deadline extended 30 September 2017* >> *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_iBozXNIJQyrGBtFaWnMjMrqbHwgMWn4ZvpRH1tDJVY/edit* >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 5 14:54:50 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:54:50 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi, Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair time to prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the end of it. Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am thinking if we can have 2hours webinar with: - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send invitations soon to NCSG members @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the current status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our members, what we need to do there? for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden and see how we can prepare that effectively. probably thinking about the format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning and current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 to 15:00, depending on GNSO Council public meeting agenda we may spend time on discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time on planning and prioritization, not just about the public comments. Best, Rafik 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline : > Hi Rafik, > > Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first point, > I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks before > Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be preparing for the > NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South Africa. In terms of dates, > the staff-led policy update webinar is on Thursday, 15 June. I am free > every day that week for our call so will wait to hear the preferred > date/time of others. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting > Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM > UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi all, > > the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to prepare for it > since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. > > * Prior to the meeting > we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we will have > at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would be to organize a prep > meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg to give a briefing about the > main topics to be discussed there, sessions etc. that should be from NCSG > standpoint since there is also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar > organized by the staff. both are complementary for our members. there will > be also the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. > > I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that we select > and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic we should cover? > > * During the meeting > we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session and what we > should cover. I should share a draft agenda for discussion soon. > We may also have some informal session to share information and prepare > for the sessions of the day > > thoughts? > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Jun 5 16:40:14 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 09:40:14 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: <53b4abe7-1e63-371b-2f84-d9bbc1e31782@mail.utoronto.ca> I will try but my dissertation really has to be a priority at the moment. Have to get it completely finished prior to departure on June 21, not looking likely at the moment.... I may just throw a one page note together, much easier. cheers SP On 2017-06-05 07:54, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, > first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding > that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair > time to prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the > end of it. > Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with > that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am > thinking if we can have 2hours webinar with: > - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. > - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. > As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send > invitations soon to NCSG members > > @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the > current status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our > members, what we need to do there? > > for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden > and see how we can prepare that effectively. probably thinking about > the format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning > and current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. > > our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 > to 15:00, depending on GNSO Council public meeting agenda we may spend > time on discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time > on planning and prioritization, not just about the public comments. > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline >: > > Hi Rafik, > > Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first > point, I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks > before Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be > preparing for the NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South > Africa. In terms of dates, the staff-led policy update webinar is > on Thursday, 15 June. I am free every day that week for our call > so will wait to hear the preferred date/time of others. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting >> Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM >> UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc > >> >> Hi all, >> >> the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to >> prepare for it since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. >> >> * Prior to the meeting >> we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we >> will have at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would >> be to organize a prep meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg >> to give a briefing about the main topics to be discussed there, >> sessions etc. that should be from NCSG standpoint since there is >> also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar organized by the >> staff. both are complementary for our members. there will be also >> the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. >> >> I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that >> we select and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic >> we should cover? >> >> * During the meeting >> we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session >> and what we should cover. I should share a draft agenda for >> discussion soon. >> We may also have some informal session to share information and >> prepare for the sessions of the day >> >> thoughts? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Jun 8 05:22:16 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:22:16 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, we should review and submit NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire soon. Please check here https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit . some comments still need to be resolved and also some information needs to be backed with details like stats. the diversity subgroup is still receiving comments, hopefully, we can submit by the end this week. Best, Rafik 2017-05-29 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > Hi all, > > we have a questionnaire that we should respond to it from the diversity > subgroup which is asking for SO/AC input. I attached the questionnaire and > uploaded it in this google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_ > QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit. being a co-rapporteur there I > cannot really lead the draft for NCSG and would like to ask if someone want > to jump in. > The deadline is the 1st June but I think we can submit by the end of this > week. I will also share the draft with the NCSG list for comments. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Fri Jun 9 04:44:35 2017 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 01:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: <53b4abe7-1e63-371b-2f84-d9bbc1e31782@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> <53b4abe7-1e63-371b-2f84-d9bbc1e31782@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <495150285.6817300.1496972675074@mail.yahoo.com> Hi everyone,?I agree about webinar before Johannesburg. Count on me if I can give a hand. Also I like Rafik's idea on to make just one call of two hours.?Best Regards,?JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. Presidente?-?AGEIA DENSI?ColombiaCommunications Committee Chair.?Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANNCluster Orinoco TIC memberMaster IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes Cel. +57 3017435600 Twitter:?@JmanuRojas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El Lunes, 5 de junio, 2017 8:35:23, Stephanie Perrin escribi?: I will try but my dissertation really has to be a priority at the moment.? Have to get it completely finished prior to departure on June 21, not looking likely at the moment.... I may just throw a one page note together, much easier. cheers SP On 2017-06-05 07:54, Rafik Dammak wrote: Hi,? Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair time to prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the end of it.? Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am thinking if we can have 2hours webinar with: - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send invitations soon to NCSG members @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the current status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our members, what we need to do there? for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden and see how we can prepare that effectively. ?probably thinking about the format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning and current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 to 15:00, depending on GNSO Council?public meeting agenda we may spend time on discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time on planning and prioritization, not just about the public?comments. ? Best, Rafik 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline : Hi Rafik, Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first point, I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks before Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be preparing for the NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South Africa. In terms of dates, the staff-led policy update webinar is on Thursday, 15 June. I am free every day that week for our call so will wait to hear the preferred date/time of others. Best wishes, Ayden ? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi all, the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to prepare for it since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. * Prior to the meeting we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we will have at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would be to organize a prep meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg to give a briefing about the main topics to be discussed there, sessions etc. that should be from NCSG standpoint since there is also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar organized by the staff. both are complementary for our members. there will be also the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that we select and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic we should cover?? * During the meeting we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session and what we should cover. I should share a draft agenda for discussion soon.? We may also have some informal session to share information and prepare for the sessions of the day thoughts? Best, Rafik _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jun 9 16:13:41 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:13:41 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik, Apologies for the delay in my response; I have been offline the past six days for EuroDIG. I am not sure about this NCSG webinar anymore. It is a wonderful idea, however I am not sure we have the resources to compile it along with four daily outreach/policy sessions and (for those of us in the NCUC) a two-day pre-event, all of which is happening by the end of this month. Is this webinar critical? Will its content vary significantly from that which ICANN policy staff will be delivering anyway on 15 June? If the answer is in the affirmative, let's do it, but if not... maybe we should re-think having this webinar? Thanks. Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting Local Time: June 5, 2017 12:54 PM UTC Time: June 5, 2017 11:54 AM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi, Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair time to prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the end of it. Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am thinking if we can have 2hours webinar with: - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send invitations soon to NCSG members @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the current status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our members, what we need to do there? for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden and see how we can prepare that effectively. probably thinking about the format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning and current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 to 15:00, depending on GNSO Council public meeting agenda we may spend time on discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time on planning and prioritization, not just about the public comments. Best, Rafik 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline : Hi Rafik, Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first point, I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks before Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be preparing for the NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South Africa. In terms of dates, the staff-led policy update webinar is on Thursday, 15 June. I am free every day that week for our call so will wait to hear the preferred date/time of others. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi all, the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to prepare for it since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. * Prior to the meeting we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we will have at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would be to organize a prep meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg to give a briefing about the main topics to be discussed there, sessions etc. that should be from NCSG standpoint since there is also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar organized by the staff. both are complementary for our members. there will be also the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that we select and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic we should cover? * During the meeting we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session and what we should cover. I should share a draft agenda for discussion soon. We may also have some informal session to share information and prepare for the sessions of the day thoughts? Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jun 9 16:22:47 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:22:47 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Soliciting interviewees for ICANN Nomcom Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, is there anyone traveling to Johannesburg who we should be encouraging to schedule a face-to-face with the team of independent examiners? I hope we can input into this review. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Soliciting interviewees for ICANN Nomcom Review Local Time: June 8, 2017 7:13 PM UTC Time: June 8, 2017 6:13 PM From: bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org Hi all, In case you missed it, an Independent Examiner (IE) has been selected to conduct an independent review of the ICANN Nominating Committee (Nomcom). See the announcement here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-06-07-en They have already begun work and will be in Johannesburg to introduce themselves and begin conducting interviews. ** If you meet the subject criteria in the announcement, and have an interest in speaking with the IE, please make contact with ICANN staff as soon as possible. ** If you do not meet the above criteria, but still have input, there will be a subsequent survey for the broader community. I'll provide an update with more information about that process/dates and the overall review schedule soon. Please reach out to me if you have questions, I'll do my best to provide an answer. Regards, Brenden --------------------------------------- Brenden Kuerbis Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pileleji at ymca.gm Fri Jun 9 16:40:33 2017 From: pileleji at ymca.gm (Poncelet Ileleji) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:40:33 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hello Rafik, Two many stuff happening it seems as ICANN59 approaches. My suggestion Rafik select an important topic that is cross cutting and will add value to NCUC and NPOC outreach events in ICANN59 and we move on with it, those who can attend will attend especially as we have a lot of new members. I hope this helps. Kind Regards Poncelet On 9 June 2017 at 13:13, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > Apologies for the delay in my response; I have been offline the past six > days for EuroDIG. I am not sure about this NCSG webinar anymore. It is a > wonderful idea, however I am not sure we have the resources to compile it > along with four daily outreach/policy sessions and (for those of us in the > NCUC) a two-day pre-event, all of which is happening by the end of this > month. Is this webinar critical? Will its content vary significantly from > that which ICANN policy staff will be delivering anyway on 15 June? If the > answer is in the affirmative, let's do it, but if not... maybe we should > re-think having this webinar? Thanks. > > Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting > Local Time: June 5, 2017 12:54 PM > UTC Time: June 5, 2017 11:54 AM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi, > > Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, > first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding > that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair time to > prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the end of it. > Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with > that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am thinking > if we can have 2hours webinar with: > - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. > - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. > As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send > invitations soon to NCSG members > > @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the current > status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our members, what we > need to do there? > > for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden and > see how we can prepare that effectively. probably thinking about the > format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning and > current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. > > our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 to > 15:00, depending on GNSO Council public meeting agenda we may spend time on > discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time on planning > and prioritization, not just about the public comments. > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline : > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first point, >> I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks before >> Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be preparing for the >> NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South Africa. In terms of dates, >> the staff-led policy update webinar is on Thursday, 15 June. I am free >> every day that week for our call so will wait to hear the preferred >> date/time of others. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting >> Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM >> UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc >> >> Hi all, >> >> the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to prepare for it >> since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. >> >> * Prior to the meeting >> we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we will have >> at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would be to organize a prep >> meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg to give a briefing about the >> main topics to be discussed there, sessions etc. that should be from NCSG >> standpoint since there is also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar >> organized by the staff. both are complementary for our members. there will >> be also the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. >> >> I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that we >> select and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic we should >> cover? >> >> * During the meeting >> we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session and what >> we should cover. I should share a draft agenda for discussion soon. >> We may also have some informal session to share information and prepare >> for the sessions of the day >> >> thoughts? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ www.waigf.org www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 *www.diplointernetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jun 9 16:45:04 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:45:04 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you, Rafik. I have now made some additional comments and revisions to the drafted text. Dorothy made a very good comment about the instruments ICANN provides us with, which I have expanded upon and appended as an additional comment. I support the submission of this questionnaire response on behalf of the NCSG, noting that we have already shared it on the NCSG list with our membership and not hearing any objections. - Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire Local Time: June 8, 2017 3:22 AM UTC Time: June 8, 2017 2:22 AM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi all, we should review and submit NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire soon. Please check here https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit . some comments still need to be resolved and also some information needs to be backed with details like stats. the diversity subgroup is still receiving comments, hopefully, we can submit by the end this week. Best, Rafik 2017-05-29 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : Hi all, we have a questionnaire that we should respond to it from the diversity subgroup which is asking for SO/AC input. I attached the questionnaire and uploaded it in this google doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit. being a co-rapporteur there I cannot really lead the draft for NCSG and would like to ask if someone want to jump in. The deadline is the 1st June but I think we can submit by the end of this week. I will also share the draft with the NCSG list for comments. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at intpolicy.com Fri Jun 9 18:25:01 2017 From: matthew at intpolicy.com (Matthew Shears) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:25:01 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2cfde89f-4081-c9db-d678-00d1f4ff78f5@intpolicy.com> Works for me - thanks all. On 09/06/2017 08:45, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Thank you, Rafik. I have now made some additional comments and > revisions to the drafted text. Dorothy made a very good comment about > the instruments ICANN provides us with, which I have expanded upon and > appended as an additional comment. I support the submission of this > questionnaire response on behalf of the NCSG, noting that we have > already shared it on the NCSG list with our membership and not hearing > any objections. > > - Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire >> Local Time: June 8, 2017 3:22 AM >> UTC Time: June 8, 2017 2:22 AM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc >> >> Hi all, >> >> we should review and submit NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire >> soon. Please check here >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit >> . some comments still need to be resolved and also some information >> needs to be backed with details like stats. >> the diversity subgroup is still receiving comments, hopefully, we can >> submit by the end this week. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2017-05-29 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak > >: >> >> Hi all, >> >> we have a questionnaire that we should respond to it from the >> diversity subgroup which is asking for SO/AC input. I attached >> the questionnaire and uploaded it in this google doc >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit >> . >> being a co-rapporteur there I cannot really lead the draft for >> NCSG and would like to ask if someone want to jump in. >> The deadline is the 1st June but I think we can submit by the end >> of this week. I will also share the draft with the NCSG list for >> comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> > > > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Fri Jun 9 17:44:58 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:44:58 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire In-Reply-To: <2cfde89f-4081-c9db-d678-00d1f4ff78f5@intpolicy.com> References: <2cfde89f-4081-c9db-d678-00d1f4ff78f5@intpolicy.com> Message-ID: Please go for it, sorry for late response. Stephanie On 2017-06-09 11:25, Matthew Shears wrote: > > Works for me - thanks all. > > > On 09/06/2017 08:45, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >> Thank you, Rafik. I have now made some additional comments and >> revisions to the drafted text. Dorothy made a very good comment about >> the instruments ICANN provides us with, which I have expanded upon >> and appended as an additional comment. I support the submission of >> this questionnaire response on behalf of the NCSG, noting that we >> have already shared it on the NCSG list with our membership and not >> hearing any objections. >> >> - Ayden >> >> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire >>> Local Time: June 8, 2017 3:22 AM >>> UTC Time: June 8, 2017 2:22 AM >>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>> To: ncsg-pc >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we should review and submit NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire >>> soon. Please check here >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit >>> . some comments still need to be resolved and also some information >>> needs to be backed with details like stats. >>> the diversity subgroup is still receiving comments, hopefully, we >>> can submit by the end this week. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2017-05-29 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak >> >: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we have a questionnaire that we should respond to it from the >>> diversity subgroup which is asking for SO/AC input. I attached >>> the questionnaire and uploaded it in this google doc >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit >>> . >>> being a co-rapporteur there I cannot really lead the draft for >>> NCSG and would like to ask if someone want to jump in. >>> The deadline is the 1st June but I think we can submit by the >>> end of this week. I will also share the draft with the NCSG list >>> for comments. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >> >> >> >> Virus-free. www.avg.com >> >> >> >> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- > Matthew Shears > matthew at intpolicy.com > +447712472987 > Skype:mshears > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Sat Jun 10 03:15:29 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 20:15:29 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] FW: WHOIS Conflict Procedure timeline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2fe42a0c-066e-6a55-341f-625ef43d91ca@mail.utoronto.ca> Interesting delay in the comments period for the WHOIS conflicts with law procedure. and this would be the first time, as far as I know, that they consulted the data protection authorities. Stephanie Perrin -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [council] FW: WHOIS Conflict Procedure timeline Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 19:01:18 +0000 From: Marika Konings To: council at gnso.icann.org Dear All, Please find attached for your attention, a letter from Akram Atallah concerning the timeline for the review of the ICANN Procedure for handling WHOIS conflicts with privacy law. Best regards, Marika */Marika Konings/* /Vice President, Policy Development Support ? GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) / /Email: marika.konings at icann.org / // /Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO/ /Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages . / -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Atallah to Bladel_Updated Timeline.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 412278 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ council mailing list council at gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 05:12:21 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:12:21 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire In-Reply-To: References: <2cfde89f-4081-c9db-d678-00d1f4ff78f5@intpolicy.com> Message-ID: Hi all, with support from Ayden, Mathew and Stephanie and hearing no objection, we can assume that the NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire is endorsed by the policy committee. I resolved the comments and suggestions in the Google doc and attached the latest version for reference. I will submit the response. Thanks , Best Regards, Rafik 2017-06-09 23:44 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>: > Please go for it, sorry for late response. > > Stephanie > > On 2017-06-09 11:25, Matthew Shears wrote: > > Works for me - thanks all. > > On 09/06/2017 08:45, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > > Thank you, Rafik. I have now made some additional comments and revisions > to the drafted text. Dorothy made a very good comment about the instruments > ICANN provides us with, which I have expanded upon and appended as an > additional comment. I support the submission of this questionnaire response > on behalf of the NCSG, noting that we have already shared it on the NCSG > list with our membership and not hearing any objections. > > - Ayden > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Diversity subgroup questionnaire > Local Time: June 8, 2017 3:22 AM > UTC Time: June 8, 2017 2:22 AM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi all, > > we should review and submit NCSG Response to diversity questionnaire soon. > Please check here https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ORtn_ > QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit . some comments still need to > be resolved and also some information needs to be backed with details like > stats. > the diversity subgroup is still receiving comments, hopefully, we can > submit by the end this week. > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2017-05-29 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > >> Hi all, >> >> we have a questionnaire that we should respond to it from the diversity >> subgroup which is asking for SO/AC input. I attached the questionnaire and >> uploaded it in this google doc https://docs.google.com/docume >> nt/d/19ORtn_QTSavUC6WsZsmLCB7G_N4lffGNxmqWeMB8ByM/edit. being a >> co-rapporteur there I cannot really lead the draft for NCSG and would like >> to ask if someone want to jump in. >> The deadline is the 1st June but I think we can submit by the end of this >> week. I will also share the draft with the NCSG list for comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> > > > Virus-free. > www.avg.com > > <#m_729893590623787296_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -- > Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSGresponsetoCCWGdiversity.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 96096 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 05:22:25 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:22:25 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <0cnzkaHyfjhMCjGdDy1SoqQxfQyqsoS9Rx2x_Ppur5V5SA-itIXIbPAa4Tu_zJmU0reP03Xger_zXJTYpiIl6cyVYULjn7_ZiUyZ6VFrry0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi, taking on account the last comments, I think we can scale down for the webinar having 1 hours instead of 2 hours and focusing on few topics: RDS, RPM, and new gTLD subsequent procedures, also auctions. While there is the ICANN policy webinar, our effort is complementing it and focusing on giving our membership an insight about the NCSG positions, history and so on. I would like to ask Stephanie, Kathy and Avri, if they can give a short briefing about each working group and highlight where, is the focus now and in Johannesburg meeting. Policy staff released lately 2 newsletters and will do for the background briefing soon, we can share them again to our membership and ask those planning to attend to read them as background material. the announcement for the webinar was not made yet to the list and I think organizing it for this Friday will be short notice, I am thinking that Monday would be appropriate. checking if that is ok for you. Best, Rafik 2017-06-09 22:40 GMT+09:00 Poncelet Ileleji : > Hello Rafik, > > Two many stuff happening it seems as ICANN59 approaches. My suggestion > Rafik select an important topic that is cross cutting and will add value to > NCUC and NPOC outreach events in ICANN59 and we move on with it, those who > can attend will attend especially as we have a lot of new members. > > I hope this helps. > > Kind Regards > > Poncelet > > On 9 June 2017 at 13:13, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Apologies for the delay in my response; I have been offline the past six >> days for EuroDIG. I am not sure about this NCSG webinar anymore. It is a >> wonderful idea, however I am not sure we have the resources to compile it >> along with four daily outreach/policy sessions and (for those of us in the >> NCUC) a two-day pre-event, all of which is happening by the end of this >> month. Is this webinar critical? Will its content vary significantly from >> that which ICANN policy staff will be delivering anyway on 15 June? If the >> answer is in the affirmative, let's do it, but if not... maybe we should >> re-think having this webinar? Thanks. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting >> Local Time: June 5, 2017 12:54 PM >> UTC Time: June 5, 2017 11:54 AM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, Farzaneh, Stephanie, Ayden, >> first thing is that we have to prepare for NCSG webinar. Understanding >> that we should avoid the week prior to the meeting and have a fair time to >> prepare, it means we can hold it next week, probably at the end of it. >> Only one topic we got till now is Auctions proceeds and we can go with >> that. I am not sure we can have 2 calls in the same week so I am thinking >> if we can have 2hours webinar with: >> - first hour to do a general policy briefing about ongoing PDPs and CCWG. >> - Second hours taking auctions proceeds as 1 topic for discussion. >> As dates, we can have the call in Wednesday or Friday. we should send >> invitations soon to NCSG members >> >> @Stephanie are you able to prepare some slides to introduce the current >> status of auctions proceeds and why it matters got our members, what we >> need to do there? >> >> for outreach/policy sessions of Daily 30min, I will work with Ayden and >> see how we can prepare that effectively. probably thinking about the >> format and how to present the topics presenting NCSG positioning and >> current status of PDPs for a diverse audience including newcomers. >> >> our NCSG Policy Committee meeting, it is scheduled for Tuesday 13:30 to >> 15:00, depending on GNSO Council public meeting agenda we may spend time on >> discussing motions. however, I would like that we spend time on planning >> and prioritization, not just about the public comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2017-05-30 5:19 GMT+09:00 Ayden F?rdeline : >> >>> Hi Rafik, >>> >>> Thanks so much for getting the ball rolling on this. On your first >>> point, I would like to suggest that we have this call two weeks before >>> Johannesburg. In the week before, NCUC members might be preparing for the >>> NCUC outreach event, if not in transit to South Africa. In terms of dates, >>> the staff-led policy update webinar is on Thursday, 15 June. I am free >>> every day that week for our call so will wait to hear the preferred >>> date/time of others. >>> >>> Best wishes, Ayden >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Preparing for Johannesburg Meeting >>> Local Time: May 29, 2017 2:40 PM >>> UTC Time: May 29, 2017 1:40 PM >>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>> To: ncsg-pc >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the ICANN59 meeting is just 4 weeks away and it is time to prepare for >>> it since it is policy forum and so mainly about policy. >>> >>> * Prior to the meeting >>> we usually have our NCSG call prior to a council meeting but we will >>> have at least 6 weeks gap to our last call. One idea would be to organize a >>> prep meeting 1 or 2 weeks prior to Johannesburg to give a briefing about >>> the main topics to be discussed there, sessions etc. that should be from >>> NCSG standpoint since there is also the usual ICANN meeting policy webinar >>> organized by the staff. both are complementary for our members. there will >>> be also the usual policy background briefing prepared from GNSO staff. >>> >>> I am also thinking about organizing 1 webinar for one topic that we >>> select and that we think important. any suggestion for a topic we should >>> cover? >>> >>> * During the meeting >>> we have to discuss the agenda for the policy committee session and what >>> we should cover. I should share a draft agenda for discussion soon. >>> We may also have some informal session to share information and prepare >>> for the sessions of the day >>> >>> thoughts? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > > > -- > Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS > Coordinator > The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio > MDI Road Kanifing South > P. O. Box 421 Banjul > The Gambia, West Africa > Tel: (220) 4370240 > Fax:(220) 4390793 > Cell:(220) 9912508 > Skype: pons_utd > > > > > > > *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ > www.waigf.org > www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org > http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 > *www.diplointernetgovernance.org > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 05:36:00 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:36:00 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment Message-ID: Hi all, the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ please review the current draft and share your comments. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rafik Dammak Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" Hi , I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help for the drafting. Best, Rafik 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > Hi all, > > the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public > comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights ( > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). > > I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG > response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that > subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please > let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a > google doc to start https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSK > q7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ > > Best, > > Rafik > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Mon Jun 12 13:25:02 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 06:25:02 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi all, the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ please review the current draft and share your comments. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rafik Dammak Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" Hi , I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help for the drafting. Best, Rafik 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : Hi all, the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a google doc to start https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pileleji at ymca.gm Mon Jun 12 14:34:14 2017 From: pileleji at ymca.gm (Poncelet Ileleji) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:34:14 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Rafik, Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. Kind Regards Poncelet On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this > comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / > NCSG comment > Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM > UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi all, > > the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of > interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY- > WUmRN4zTqCJE/ > > please review the current draft and share your comments. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rafik Dammak > Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 > Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights > To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" > > > Hi , > > I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human Rights > Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the draft, > Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help for > the drafting. > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > >> Hi all, >> >> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public >> comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights ( >> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). >> >> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG >> response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that >> subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please >> let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a >> google doc to start https://docs.google.com/ >> document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ www.waigf.org www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 *www.diplointernetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpsilvavalent at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 20:15:54 2017 From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com (Martin Pablo Silva Valent) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:15:54 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey all, I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any extra support from my side on this. Cheers, Martin Silva > On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji wrote: > > Dear Rafik, > > Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. > > Kind Regards > > Poncelet > > On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline > wrote: > Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. > > Best wishes, Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment >> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc > >> >> Hi all, >> >> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >> >> please review the current draft and share your comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Rafik Dammak > >> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights >> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu " > >> >> >> Hi , >> >> I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help for the drafting. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak >: >> Hi all, >> >> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en ). >> >> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a google doc to start https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > > -- > Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS > Coordinator > The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio > MDI Road Kanifing South > P. O. Box 421 Banjul > The Gambia, West Africa > Tel: (220) 4370240 > Fax:(220) 4390793 > Cell:(220) 9912508 > Skype: pons_utd > www.ymca.gm > http://jokkolabs.net/en/ > www.waigf.org > www,insistglobal.com > www.npoc.org > http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 > www.diplointernetgovernance.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Mon Jun 12 20:17:16 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:17:16 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Public consultation on the evaluation and revision of the .eu top-level domain regulations Message-ID: The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the .eu top-level domain. Is this something that the NCSG should be commenting on? I have pasted below what the EU has identified as its objectives for this consultation. https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/public-consultation-evaluation-and-revision-eu-top-level-domain-regulations_en Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline -- The purpose of this consultation is to collect views on the performance of the Regulations that are governing the .eu top-level domain. The .eu domain is the country code top level domain (ccTLD) for the European Union. Initiated by the Commission, it was formally established by Regulation 733/2002 of 22 April 2002 (as amended). The EC Regulation 874/2004 set the rules for the registry and the .eu. The .eu TLD was delegated by ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) in 2005. The main aim of the .eu (and .?? in Cyrillic script - hereafter ?.eu?) is to contribute effectively to the Digital Single Market by encouraging and increasing secure and reliable e-commerce and build a strong digital identity for people and organisations in the European Union. The .eu TLD ranks among the largest top-level domains. It is operated by EURid, a Belgian not-for-profit organisation, upon appointment of the European Commission. Therefore EURid is the current .eu registry. The .eu domain names can be registered through a network of approximately 700 companies, called "accredited registrars". Over a decade after their entry into force, the .eu Regulations should be reviewed to take into account the developments and challenges of the current domain name industry and to become more flexible and future-proof. The Commission's 2017 Work Programme provides that the revision of the eu. Regulations fall under the Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) and that it should be preceded by an evaluation to assess whether the current regulatory framework is fit-for-purpose. On the basis of the findings, the Commission will define policy options to be pursued with the review the .eu Regulations. Examples of areas for which future options may be developed are: - facilitate operational management (e.g. the introduction of a much easier process for reserving .eu domain names for the European Institutions and Member/Candidate Countries); - update the Regulations in view of changed market circumstances. That might entail the introduction of a possibility for the .eu registry to sell directly to end-users in currently underserved markets where end-users have difficulties in finding a local domain name provider; - ensure the rules are future-proof, and allow the .eu TLD registry to introduce new services, if appropriate, that complement the management of the .eu TLD and its variants in other scripts (without having to amend the Regulations each time to do so); - promote EU priorities in Internet Governance, possibly by including provisions which would explicitly orient the .eu Registry's activities to that direction; - enhance the use of .eu as an online European identity. This might include among others consideration on changing the eligibility criteria for end-users. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at intpolicy.com Mon Jun 12 22:13:53 2017 From: matthew at intpolicy.com (Matthew Shears) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:13:53 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest replacing the summary text with the actual text from the FoI. Matthew On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: > Hey all, > I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any > extra support from my side on this. > > Cheers, > Martin Silva > >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji > > wrote: >> >> Dear Rafik, >> >> Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Poncelet >> >> On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline > > wrote: >> >> Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission >> of this comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human >>> Rights / NCSG comment >>> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >>> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>> To: ncsg-pc > >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of >>> interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>> >>> >>> please review the current draft and share your comments. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: *Rafik Dammak* >> > >>> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >>> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights >>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu >>> " >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> Hi , >>> >>> I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on >>> Human Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly >>> volunteered to lead the draft, Bruna also going him to help. >>> please feel free to join them and help for the drafting. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak >> >: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for >>> public comments with regard to the framework of >>> interpretation for Human Rights >>> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en >>> ). >>> >>> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the >>> drafting of NCSG response to the public comments. We have >>> several members involved in that subgroup including Niels as >>> co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please let me know >>> if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a >>> google doc to start >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS >> Coordinator >> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio >> MDI Road Kanifing South >> P. O. Box 421 Banjul >> The Gambia, West Africa >> Tel: (220) 4370240 >> Fax:(220) 4390793 >> Cell:(220) 9912508 >> Skype: pons_utd >> /www.ymca.gm >> http://jokkolabs.net/en/ >> www.waigf.org >> www,insistglobal.com >> www.npoc.org >> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 >> /www.diplointernetgovernance.org >> >> >> * >> * >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Wed Jun 14 21:26:21 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:26:21 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [epic_advisors] ACTION - End FCC Data Retention Mandate (DEADLINE: Friday COB) In-Reply-To: <7D85ACCE-C562-456D-85A2-3068961A95A9@epic.org> References: <7D85ACCE-C562-456D-85A2-3068961A95A9@epic.org> Message-ID: If anyone has an interest in helping EPIC get the FCC to end data retention of phone records. Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Dear Members of the EPIC Advisory Board, The *_FCC has agreed to consider EPIC?s Petition_* to end the FCC regulation that requires telephone companies to keep the toll records of their customers for 18 months. EPIC initiated this action in 2015, with the support of many members of the EPIC Advisory Board. Now *_we need to get comments to the FCC in support of the petition_*. Here are the _*key reasons to end the FCC mandate:*_ ? The mass retention of telecommunications records implicates privacy and freedom of association of millions of Americans who are suspected of no wrongdoing. ? The retention of sensitive phone records increases the likelihood of large-scale data breaches like the OPM data breach in 2015 ? Modern non-measured, bundled phone billing makes the rule unnecessary. ? The US data retention requirement for telephone records is at odds with international law and fundamental rights *_Here is how you can help:_* (1) /_Submit comments._/ Okay to include points above and to add your own. The FCC link is here: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/proceedings?q=name:((17-130)) (2) /_Promote the EPIC campaign_/. The EPIC link is here: https://epic.org/privacy/fcc-data-retention/ (3) /_Tweet #MyCallsMyData with links._/ https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/proceedings?q=name:((17-130)) https://epic.org/privacy/fcc-data-retention/ (4) /_Forward this email to lists, colleagues, and friends_/ We need a broad response for the FCC to act favorably. Thanks for your help with this. There is not much time to act. Marc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jun 16 20:13:13 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:13:13 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law In-Reply-To: References: <9Uk4_cfmLnBse0hWrekYPHE6sDSu8Kird4h66a4JPc-t8ROobpaWLAn8QfHFWUjE0Nio1x9rLLqllpeuwyaOCZw5vPcCxrbbR4ZZSoj5bJ0=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Hi all, Would be great to get some feedback on this [proposed comment](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing) please. The Google Doc is (hopefully) configured to allow anyone to edit it. Comments are due in roughly two weeks time. As some of us will be traveling next week, then engaged with ICANN 59, I'm hoping you might be able to take a look over the comment over the next few days with a view to submitting it (if appropriate) shortly thereafter. Thank you! Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Local Time: June 13, 2017 11:05 PM UTC Time: June 13, 2017 10:05 PM From: icann at ferdeline.com To: Ayden F?rdeline NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Hello all, I have revised our draft comment on the effectiveness of the updated ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Paragraphs 3 and 7, in particular, are new. Your review of and feedback on this proposed comment is warmly welcomed. The submission deadline is 7 July, but I am hoping we may be able to finalise the comment before this date, given we have ICANN 59 approaching in just over a week's time. Thank you! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law Local Time: May 13, 2017 8:36 PM UTC Time: May 13, 2017 7:36 PM From: icann at FERDELINE.COM To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Dear colleagues, I have drafted a comment on behalf of the NCSG on the effectiveness of the updated [ICANN Procedure](https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-privacy-law-2017-05-03-en) for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. I warmly welcome your comments, suggestions, and edits so that we can strengthen this comment. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing The deadline for submission of comments on this topic is in 30 days, on 12 June. I would like to get this to the Policy Committee to review one week earlier, on 5 June, so I kindly ask that you make your comments before this time if you can please. Thanks! Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Jun 16 23:28:05 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 05:28:05 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, please find attached the latest version of the comment for submission. I cleaned up the document and resolved comments such the one from Tatiana regarding Ruggie principles. The comment is fairly short and support the work done by the subgroup Ayden, Poncelet and Martin supported the comment for submission. I understand that Matt edited directly in the document and assuming he is fine with the rest. with no objection heard from others, we can interpret that the comment is endorsed by NCSG PC to be submitted. I will submit the comment in the coming hours. Thanks, Best, Rafik 2017-06-13 4:13 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears : > I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest replacing the > summary text with the actual text from the FoI. > > Matthew > > On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: > > Hey all, > I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any extra > support from my side on this. > > Cheers, > Martin Silva > > On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji wrote: > > Dear Rafik, > > Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. > > Kind Regards > > Poncelet > > On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > >> Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this >> comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. >> >> Best wishes, Ayden >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / >> NCSG comment >> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc >> >> Hi all, >> >> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of >> interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu >> 72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >> >> please review the current draft and share your comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Rafik Dammak >> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights >> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" >> >> >> Hi , >> >> I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human >> Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the >> draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help >> for the drafting. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public >>> comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights ( >>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). >>> >>> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG >>> response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that >>> subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please >>> let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a >>> google doc to start https://docs.google.com/ >>> document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > > > -- > Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS > Coordinator > The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio > MDI Road Kanifing South > P. O. Box 421 Banjul > The Gambia, West Africa > Tel: (220) 4370240 > Fax:(220) 4390793 > Cell:(220) 9912508 > Skype: pons_utd > > > > > > > *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ > www.waigf.org > www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org > http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 > *www.diplointernetgovernance.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > > Virus-free. > www.avg.com > > <#m_-5789777002012358548_m_160917456976100943_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > -- > Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DraftFrameworkofInterpretationforHumanRights-NCSGComment.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 51593 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Jun 17 00:04:24 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 06:04:24 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, just after my email, Claudio suggested this edit: "We stress the importance of Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIAs) for the implementation of the FoI-HR, and value the possibility of deploying the initiative to effectively enact the Human Rights Bylaw While acknowledging that international human rights instruments only create obligations for States, we recognize the relevance of having the Human Rights Core Value implemented as guidance for ICANN?s decisions, processes, and actions" no idea how to handle this at a late stage and if we can accept it now. the comment seems sensible. any suggestion? Best, Rafik 2017-06-17 5:28 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > Hi all, > > please find attached the latest version of the comment for submission. I > cleaned up the document and resolved comments such the one from Tatiana > regarding Ruggie principles. The comment is fairly short and support the > work done by the subgroup > Ayden, Poncelet and Martin supported the comment for submission. I > understand that Matt edited directly in the document and assuming he is > fine with the rest. with no objection heard from others, we can interpret > that the comment is endorsed by NCSG PC to be submitted. > I will submit the comment in the coming hours. > > Thanks, > > Best, > > Rafik > > > 2017-06-13 4:13 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears : > >> I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest replacing the >> summary text with the actual text from the FoI. >> >> Matthew >> >> On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any extra >> support from my side on this. >> >> Cheers, >> Martin Silva >> >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji wrote: >> >> Dear Rafik, >> >> Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Poncelet >> >> On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >> >>> Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this >>> comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. >>> >>> Best wishes, Ayden >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / >>> NCSG comment >>> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >>> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>> To: ncsg-pc >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of >>> interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu >>> 72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>> >>> please review the current draft and share your comments. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Rafik Dammak >>> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >>> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights >>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" >>> >>> >>> Hi , >>> >>> I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human >>> Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the >>> draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help >>> for the drafting. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public >>>> comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights ( >>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). >>>> >>>> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG >>>> response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that >>>> subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please >>>> let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a >>>> google doc to start https://docs.google.com/ >>>> document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS >> Coordinator >> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio >> MDI Road Kanifing South >> P. O. Box 421 Banjul >> The Gambia, West Africa >> Tel: (220) 4370240 >> Fax:(220) 4390793 >> Cell:(220) 9912508 >> Skype: pons_utd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ >> www.waigf.org >> www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org >> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 >> *www.diplointernetgovernance.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> >> Virus-free. >> www.avg.com >> >> <#m_7026312710681785657_m_-5789777002012358548_m_160917456976100943_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> -- >> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Jun 17 00:13:21 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 06:13:21 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I guess it is better to not accept this late addition since nobody had chance to review it appropriately and the deadline is just less than 3 hours away. I will submit the latest version I sent previously. Best, Rafik On Jun 17, 2017 6:04 AM, "Rafik Dammak" wrote: hi all, just after my email, Claudio suggested this edit: "We stress the importance of Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIAs) for the implementation of the FoI-HR, and value the possibility of deploying the initiative to effectively enact the Human Rights Bylaw While acknowledging that international human rights instruments only create obligations for States, we recognize the relevance of having the Human Rights Core Value implemented as guidance for ICANN?s decisions, processes, and actions" no idea how to handle this at a late stage and if we can accept it now. the comment seems sensible. any suggestion? Best, Rafik 2017-06-17 5:28 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : > Hi all, > > please find attached the latest version of the comment for submission. I > cleaned up the document and resolved comments such the one from Tatiana > regarding Ruggie principles. The comment is fairly short and support the > work done by the subgroup > Ayden, Poncelet and Martin supported the comment for submission. I > understand that Matt edited directly in the document and assuming he is > fine with the rest. with no objection heard from others, we can interpret > that the comment is endorsed by NCSG PC to be submitted. > I will submit the comment in the coming hours. > > Thanks, > > Best, > > Rafik > > > 2017-06-13 4:13 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears : > >> I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest replacing the >> summary text with the actual text from the FoI. >> >> Matthew >> >> On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any extra >> support from my side on this. >> >> Cheers, >> Martin Silva >> >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji wrote: >> >> Dear Rafik, >> >> Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Poncelet >> >> On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: >> >>> Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this >>> comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. >>> >>> Best wishes, Ayden >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / >>> NCSG comment >>> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >>> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>> To: ncsg-pc >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of >>> interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu >>> 72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>> >>> please review the current draft and share your comments. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Rafik Dammak >>> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >>> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights >>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" >>> >>> >>> Hi , >>> >>> I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human >>> Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the >>> draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help >>> for the drafting. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public >>>> comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights ( >>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). >>>> >>>> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG >>>> response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that >>>> subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please >>>> let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a >>>> google doc to start https://docs.google.com/ >>>> document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS >> Coordinator >> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio >> MDI Road Kanifing South >> P. O. Box 421 Banjul >> The Gambia, West Africa >> Tel: (220) 4370240 >> Fax:(220) 4390793 >> Cell:(220) 9912508 >> Skype: pons_utd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ >> www.waigf.org >> www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org >> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 >> *www.diplointernetgovernance.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> >> Virus-free. >> www.avg.com >> >> <#m_1545728091671041049_m_7026312710681785657_m_-5789777002012358548_m_160917456976100943_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> -- >> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Jun 17 12:16:08 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 05:16:08 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1ED_4CkQUX_8ydqhKXApY2J2xLcBRj8e-HnbAv7j3o7flt97ljaXbEpeEvFulbTQzX5T_xit6N-Uy7__cZ7VK5M_wm8aUg_pTDbbXkkjj5Q=@ferdeline.com> Thanks, Rafik, I think that was the right call. - Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment Local Time: June 16, 2017 10:13 PM UTC Time: June 16, 2017 9:13 PM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: Matthew Shears ncsg-pc Hi, I guess it is better to not accept this late addition since nobody had chance to review it appropriately and the deadline is just less than 3 hours away. I will submit the latest version I sent previously. Best, Rafik On Jun 17, 2017 6:04 AM, "Rafik Dammak" wrote: hi all, just after my email, Claudio suggested this edit: "We stress the importance of Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIAs) for the implementation of the FoI-HR, and value the possibility of deploying the initiative to effectively enact the Human Rights Bylaw While acknowledging that international human rights instruments only create obligations for States, we recognize the relevance of having the Human Rights Core Value implemented as guidance for ICANN?s decisions, processes, and actions" no idea how to handle this at a late stage and if we can accept it now. the comment seems sensible. any suggestion? Best, Rafik 2017-06-17 5:28 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : Hi all, please find attached the latest version of the comment for submission. I cleaned up the document and resolved comments such the one from Tatiana regarding Ruggie principles. The comment is fairly short and support the work done by the subgroup Ayden, Poncelet and Martin supported the comment for submission. I understand that Matt edited directly in the document and assuming he is fine with the rest. with no objection heard from others, we can interpret that the comment is endorsed by NCSG PC to be submitted. I will submit the comment in the coming hours. Thanks, Best, Rafik 2017-06-13 4:13 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears : I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest replacing the summary text with the actual text from the FoI. Matthew On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: Hey all, I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if you need any extra support from my side on this. Cheers, Martin Silva On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji wrote: Dear Rafik, Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. Kind Regards Poncelet On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support the submission of this comment with the amendment proposed by Tatiana. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com To: ncsg-pc Hi all, the deadline to submit the comment for the draft framework of interpretation for Human Rights is the 16th June, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ please review the current draft and share your comments. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rafik Dammak Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" Hi , I am sending this just a reminder about the public comment on Human Rights Framework of Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead the draft, Bruna also going him to help. please feel free to join them and help for the drafting. Best, Rafik 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak : Hi all, the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a draft document for public comments with regard to the framework of interpretation for Human Rights (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en). I am sharing this to call for volunteers to lead the drafting of NCSG response to the public comments. We have several members involved in that subgroup including Niels as co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. please let me know if you want to volunteer for the drafting. I just created a google doc to start https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ Best, Rafik _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd [www.ymca.gm](http://www.ymca.gm/) http://jokkolabs.net/en/ [www.waigf.org](http://www.waigf.org/) [www,insistglobal.com](http://www.itag.gm/) [www.npoc.org](http://www.npoc.org/) http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753[www.diplointernetgovernance.org](http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/) _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. [www.avg.com](http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient) #m_1545728091671041049_m_7026312710681785657_m_-5789777002012358548_m_160917456976100943_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2 ______________________________ _________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is [https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ listinfo/ncsg-pc](https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc) -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com [+447712472987](tel:+44%207712%20472987) Skype:mshears _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at intpolicy.com Sat Jun 17 16:22:50 2017 From: matthew at intpolicy.com (Matthew Shears) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 08:22:50 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment In-Reply-To: <1ED_4CkQUX_8ydqhKXApY2J2xLcBRj8e-HnbAv7j3o7flt97ljaXbEpeEvFulbTQzX5T_xit6N-Uy7__cZ7VK5M_wm8aUg_pTDbbXkkjj5Q=@ferdeline.com> References: <1ED_4CkQUX_8ydqhKXApY2J2xLcBRj8e-HnbAv7j3o7flt97ljaXbEpeEvFulbTQzX5T_xit6N-Uy7__cZ7VK5M_wm8aUg_pTDbbXkkjj5Q=@ferdeline.com> Message-ID: Agree - and thanks for filing Rafik. Matthew On 17/06/2017 04:16, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Thanks, Rafik, I think that was the right call. > > - Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of Interpretation for Human >> Rights / NCSG comment >> Local Time: June 16, 2017 10:13 PM >> UTC Time: June 16, 2017 9:13 PM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: Matthew Shears >> ncsg-pc >> >> Hi, >> >> I guess it is better to not accept this late addition since nobody >> had chance to review it appropriately and the deadline is just less >> than 3 hours away. I will submit the latest version I sent previously. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> On Jun 17, 2017 6:04 AM, "Rafik Dammak" > > wrote: >> >> hi all, >> >> just after my email, Claudio suggested this edit: >> "We stress the importance of Human Rights Impact Assessments >> (HRIAs) for the implementation of the FoI-HR, and value the >> possibility of deploying the initiative to effectively enact the >> Human Rights Bylaw >> While acknowledging that international human rights instruments >> only create obligations for States, we recognize the relevance of >> having the Human Rights Core Value implemented as guidance for >> ICANN?s decisions, processes, and actions" >> >> no idea how to handle this at a late stage and if we can accept >> it now. the comment seems sensible. >> any suggestion? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2017-06-17 5:28 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak > >: >> >> Hi all, >> >> please find attached the latest version of the comment for >> submission. I cleaned up the document and resolved comments >> such the one from Tatiana regarding Ruggie principles. The >> comment is fairly short and support the work done by the subgroup >> Ayden, Poncelet and Martin supported the comment for >> submission. I understand that Matt edited directly in the >> document and assuming he is fine with the rest. with no >> objection heard from others, we can interpret that the >> comment is endorsed by NCSG PC to be submitted. >> I will submit the comment in the coming hours. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> 2017-06-13 4:13 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears >> >: >> >> I have made one recent edit to the doc where I suggest >> replacing the summary text with the actual text from the FoI. >> >> Matthew >> >> >> On 12/06/2017 12:15, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> I also agree and strongly support this, let me know if >>> you need any extra support from my side on this. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martin Silva >>> >>>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Poncelet Ileleji >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Rafik, >>>> >>>> Amendments also supported and I concur on submission too.. >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind Regards >>>> >>>> >>>> Poncelet >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12 June 2017 at 10:25, Ayden F?rdeline >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for following up on this, Rafik. I support >>>> the submission of this comment with the amendment >>>> proposed by Tatiana. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, Ayden >>>> >>>> >>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Framework of >>>>> Interpretation for Human Rights / NCSG comment >>>>> Local Time: June 12, 2017 3:36 AM >>>>> UTC Time: June 12, 2017 2:36 AM >>>>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> To: ncsg-pc >>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> the deadline to submit the comment for the draft >>>>> framework of interpretation for Human Rights is >>>>> the 16th June, >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> please review the current draft and share your >>>>> comments. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: *Rafik Dammak* >>>> > >>>>> Date: 2017-05-23 8:29 GMT+09:00 >>>>> Subject: Draft Framework of Interpretation for >>>>> Human Rights >>>>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu >>>>> " >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi , >>>>> >>>>> I am sending this just a reminder about the public >>>>> comment on Human Rights Framework of >>>>> Interpretation. Claudio kindly volunteered to lead >>>>> the draft, Bruna also going him to help. please >>>>> feel free to join them and help for the drafting. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> 2017-05-08 12:29 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak >>>>> >>>> >: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> the WS2 subgroup on Human Rights issued a >>>>> draft document for public comments with regard >>>>> to the framework of interpretation for Human >>>>> Rights >>>>> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en >>>>> ). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am sharing this to call for volunteers to >>>>> lead the drafting of NCSG response to the >>>>> public comments. We have several members >>>>> involved in that subgroup including Niels as >>>>> co-rapporteur, Tatiana, Avri and others. >>>>> please let me know if you want to volunteer >>>>> for the drafting. I just created a google doc >>>>> to start >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B8jrJHMAy_hBLNAVSKq7KCu72hi4DY-WUmRN4zTqCJE/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS >>>> Coordinator >>>> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio >>>> MDI Road Kanifing South >>>> P. O. Box 421 Banjul >>>> The Gambia, West Africa >>>> Tel: (220) 4370240 >>>> Fax:(220) 4390793 >>>> Cell:(220) 9912508 >>>> Skype: pons_utd >>>> /www.ymca.gm >>>> http://jokkolabs.net/en/ >>>> www.waigf.org >>>> www,insistglobal.com >>>> www.npoc.org >>>> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 >>>> >>>> /www.diplointernetgovernance.org >>>> >>>> >>>> * >>>> * >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Virus-free. www.avg.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Matthew Shears >> matthew at intpolicy.com >> +447712472987 >> Skype:mshears >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Sun Jun 18 16:14:37 2017 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 09:14:37 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered Community representative In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <14f488c2-7a82-1db4-1ae8-8601742f164a@mail.utoronto.ca> This is an important motion on how the GNSO will select its representative for the Empowered Community, just now submitted by the Standing Selection Committee. Please let your councilors know your views on the matter prior to the meeting in Joburg. Stephanie Perrin -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [council] Proposed motion for the selection of the Empowered Community representative Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:52:49 -0700 From: Susan Kawaguchi To: council at gnso.icann.org Hello, Please see the attached proposed motion from the Standing Selection Committee for the Empowered Community representative from the GNSO. After several weeks of meetings, discussions and reviewing the requirements for this role the committee determine this process was the most beneficial to the council. Best regards, Standing Selection Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Proposed Motion ? Confirmation of process and criteria for selection of GNSO rep to the EC Admin - upd 13 June 2017.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 153189 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ council mailing list council at gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 19 10:58:51 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:58:51 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg Message-ID: Hi all, please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 - Motions discussions/voting 2- Topics for discussions: - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments 3- AOB - Auctions Proceeds Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Jun 23 22:25:41 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 04:25:41 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Any comments on the agenda? Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Rafik Dammak" Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg To: "ncsg-pc" Cc: Hi all, please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann. org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group- ncsg-policy-committee-meeting 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://community.icann.org/display/ gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 - Motions discussions/voting 2- Topics for discussions: - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments 3- AOB - Auctions Proceeds Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From icann at ferdeline.com Sat Jun 24 08:20:00 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:20:00 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, The agenda looks good to me. I would prefer to bring the auction proceeds discussion forward, as I suspect we will be tight for time and this is quite an important working group, but I'm otherwise happy with the agenda. Thanks, Ayden > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > Local Time: June 23, 2017 8:25 PM > UTC Time: June 23, 2017 7:25 PM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi all, > Any comments on the agenda? > Best, > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > Cc: > >> Hi all, >> please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too >> Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting >> >> 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 >> - Motions discussions/voting >> 2- Topics for discussions: >> - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions >> - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments >> 3- AOB >> - Auctions Proceeds >> Best, >> Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pileleji at ymca.gm Sat Jun 24 12:06:04 2017 From: pileleji at ymca.gm (Poncelet Ileleji) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:06:04 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Rafik, I agree agenda okay, I will just say I hope the auction proceeds can have more time on the agenda. Poncelet On 24 June 2017 at 05:20, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > The agenda looks good to me. I would prefer to bring the auction proceeds > discussion forward, as I suspect we will be tight for time and this is > quite an important working group, but I'm otherwise happy with the agenda. > > Thanks, Ayden > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in > johannesburg > Local Time: June 23, 2017 8:25 PM > UTC Time: June 23, 2017 7:25 PM > From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com > To: ncsg-pc > > Hi all, > > Any comments on the agenda? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > Cc: > > Hi all, > > please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at > Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We > have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too > > Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.or > g/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg- > policy-committee-meeting > > 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://commun > ity.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+ > Agenda+28+June+2017 > - Motions discussions/voting > 2- Topics for discussions: > - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions > - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments > 3- AOB > - Auctions Proceeds > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm http://jokkolabs.net/en/ www.waigf.org www,insistglobal.com www.npoc.org http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 *www.diplointernetgovernance.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From egmorris1 at toast.net Sat Jun 24 12:24:55 2017 From: egmorris1 at toast.net (Edward Morris) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:24:55 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8F5C0325-2C31-405B-9F4B-F3AFFBC9F202@toast.net> Hi Rafik, Safe travels. I may have one or two items for AOB, depending upon what happens earlier in the meeting. Ed Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Jun 2017, at 21:26, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > Any comments on the agenda? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > Cc: > > Hi all, > > please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too > > Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting > > 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 > - Motions discussions/voting > 2- Topics for discussions: > - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions > - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments > 3- AOB > - Auctions Proceeds > > Best, > > Rafik > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at intpolicy.com Sat Jun 24 14:39:06 2017 From: matthew at intpolicy.com (Matthew Shears) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:39:06 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <07d07be7-40ec-c3e1-1e3e-f97d76fe69f6@intpolicy.com> Are there any issues that are likely to be contentious or big issues in this meeting that we might want to have a say on and should discuss in the sesssion? On 23/06/2017 19:25, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > Any comments on the agenda? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > > Cc: > > Hi all, > > please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at > Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the > agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG > Outreach/Briefing too > > Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time > https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting > > > 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 > > - Motions discussions/voting > 2- Topics for discussions: > - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions > - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments > 3- AOB > - Auctions Proceeds > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at intpolicy.com Sat Jun 24 14:51:50 2017 From: matthew at intpolicy.com (Matthew Shears) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:51:50 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6c4f65a1-b3a3-3f45-f88f-2a9da926ea58@intpolicy.com> + 1 On 24/06/2017 05:20, Ayden F?rdeline wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > The agenda looks good to me. I would prefer to bring the auction > proceeds discussion forward, as I suspect we will be tight for time > and this is quite an important working group, but I'm otherwise happy > with the agenda. > > Thanks, Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting >> in johannesburg >> Local Time: June 23, 2017 8:25 PM >> UTC Time: June 23, 2017 7:25 PM >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com >> To: ncsg-pc >> >> Hi all, >> >> Any comments on the agenda? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Rafik Dammak" > > >> Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM >> Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg >> To: "ncsg-pc" > >> Cc: >> >> Hi all, >> >> please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at >> Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the >> agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG >> Outreach/Briefing too >> >> Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time >> https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting >> >> >> 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 >> >> - Motions discussions/voting >> 2- Topics for discussions: >> - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions >> - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments >> 3- AOB >> - Auctions Proceeds >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> > > > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathykleiman.com Sun Jun 25 01:38:34 2017 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 00:38:34 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <164d203b-6a58-4571-aa7e-b41dd07de26c@kathykleiman.com> Hi Rafik, Tx for circulating. I would recommend some time to discuss the Consumer Trust Review Team Report. We submitted a strong set of comments and will be meeting with Jonathan Zuck, CCTRT Chair, during our NCSG session on Wed to discuss them. It would be good if we might discuss the comments ourselves and the best way to approach them with Zuck. http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-cct-rt-draft-report-07mar17/2017-May/000016.html Best, Kathy On 6/23/2017 9:25 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > Any comments on the agenda? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > > Cc: > > Hi all, > > please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at > Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the > agenda. We have also the morning session for NCSG > Outreach/Briefing too > > Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time > https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-policy-committee-meeting > > > 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+28+June+2017 > > - Motions discussions/voting > 2- Topics for discussions: > - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions > - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments > 3- AOB > - Auctions Proceeds > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Jun 25 01:46:41 2017 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:46:41 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: <164d203b-6a58-4571-aa7e-b41dd07de26c@kathykleiman.com> References: <164d203b-6a58-4571-aa7e-b41dd07de26c@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: Hi Kathy, Just a minor correction, Zuck will come to the NCUC session on Wed. and I strongly suggest that NCUC PC members be prepared for that segment (it will be on Wednesday and starts at 18.00) Farzaneh On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > Tx for circulating. I would recommend some time to discuss the Consumer > Trust Review Team Report. We submitted a strong set of comments and will be > meeting with Jonathan Zuck, CCTRT Chair, during our NCSG session on Wed to > discuss them. It would be good if we might discuss the comments ourselves > and the best way to approach them with Zuck. > > http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-cct-rt-draft-report- > 07mar17/2017-May/000016.html > > Best, Kathy > On 6/23/2017 9:25 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi all, > > Any comments on the agenda? > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rafik Dammak" > Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM > Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg > To: "ncsg-pc" > Cc: > > Hi all, > > please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at > Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We > have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too > > Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.or > g/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg- > policy-committee-meeting > > 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://commun > ity.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+ > Agenda+28+June+2017 > - Motions discussions/voting > 2- Topics for discussions: > - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions > - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments > 3- AOB > - Auctions Proceeds > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Jun 26 11:42:10 2017 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:42:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Reminder Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg In-Reply-To: References: <164d203b-6a58-4571-aa7e-b41dd07de26c@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: Hi all, Thanks for the responses. I take notes of all you comments and will try to amend the agenda . Best, Rafik 2017-06-25 7:46 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii : > Hi Kathy, > > Just a minor correction, Zuck will come to the NCUC session on Wed. and I > strongly suggest that NCUC PC members be prepared for that segment (it will > be on Wednesday and starts at 18.00) > > Farzaneh > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kathy Kleiman > wrote: > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Tx for circulating. I would recommend some time to discuss the Consumer >> Trust Review Team Report. We submitted a strong set of comments and will be >> meeting with Jonathan Zuck, CCTRT Chair, during our NCSG session on Wed to >> discuss them. It would be good if we might discuss the comments ourselves >> and the best way to approach them with Zuck. >> >> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-cct-rt-draft-report-0 >> 7mar17/2017-May/000016.html >> >> Best, Kathy >> On 6/23/2017 9:25 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Any comments on the agenda? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Rafik Dammak" >> Date: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM >> Subject: Draft Agenda for Policy Committee Meeting in johannesburg >> To: "ncsg-pc" >> Cc: >> >> Hi all, >> >> please find here a draft agenda for the PC meeting next week at >> Johannesburg, please let me know if we need to add/amend the agenda. We >> have also the morning session for NCSG Outreach/Briefing too >> >> Tuesday 23rd June 13:30 - 15:00 Local time https://schedule.icann.or >> g/event/B3pg/gnso-non-commercial-stakeholder-group-ncsg-poli >> cy-committee-meeting >> >> 1- Review of GNSO Council agenda https://commun >> ity.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Age >> nda+28+June+2017 >> - Motions discussions/voting >> 2- Topics for discussions: >> - Ongoing PDPs: any reports from the PDP working group sessions >> - Planning & Prioritization NCSG responses for public comments >> 3- AOB >> - Auctions Proceeds >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info Fri Jun 30 07:31:19 2017 From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 06:31:19 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ICANN GDPR Compliance Consultation Group Message-ID: <20170630043119.bliuwcnvnwbwa6fi@roller.tarvainen.info> Dear PC, For the record, new GDPR/RDS task force, officially called ICANN GDPR Compliance Consultation Group was formed very quickly during ICANN59, and after some negotiation they agreed to have three NCSG members there. We did not have time to call a formal PC meeting to select them, but discussions with those present there and over Skype quickly found agreement to select these: Stephanie Perrin Wendy Seltzer Ayden Ferdeline I'm sure they will do an excellent job. -- Tapani Tarvainen From icann at ferdeline.com Fri Jun 30 14:55:46 2017 From: icann at ferdeline.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:55:46 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law In-Reply-To: References: <9Uk4_cfmLnBse0hWrekYPHE6sDSu8Kird4h66a4JPc-t8ROobpaWLAn8QfHFWUjE0Nio1x9rLLqllpeuwyaOCZw5vPcCxrbbR4ZZSoj5bJ0=@ferdeline.com> <3c906cbf-bc1a-f29e-119d-da5eada7ed6a@edri.org> <4674d279-db36-8caa-0c65-4cbc4e90d862@edri.org> Message-ID: Would be great to receive some feedback from EDRi on this comment. The submission deadline for this comment is in seven days time, and it still needs work. Please see the Google Doc [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing); your suggested edits are warmly welcomed, especially in regards to the recommendation(s). Thanks very much! Best wishes, Ayden > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law > Local Time: June 30, 2017 1:53 PM > UTC Time: June 30, 2017 11:53 AM > From: icann at ferdeline.com > To: Maryant Fernandez Perez > NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU > > Maryant, hi- > Thank you very much for your email. I am pleased to hear that EDRi may be able to provide input into this comment on handling WHOIS conflicts with privacy laws. Our Policy Committee is agile, so if we receive comments or suggested edits up to 72 hours before the comment submission deadline of 7 July 23:59 UTC, we should be able to review them. Thanks again! > Best wishes, > > Ayden F?rdeline > [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline) > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law >> Local Time: June 28, 2017 1:11 PM >> UTC Time: June 28, 2017 11:11 AM >> From: maryant.fernandez-perez at EDRI.ORG >> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >> Hi, >> >> I've set our own internal deadline for this Friday, 30 June COB. >> I hope to be able to get back to you by then. I can't promise anything at this stage because it wasn't foreseen in our work schedule, but I'll try my best. >> >> Thanks, >> Maryant >> Le 28/06/17 ? 13:09, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : >> >>> Hi Maryant, >>> thanks for message, it will be great to get more feedback >>> any idea by when you can get input from EDRI members? >>> btw there was a public session yesterday about GDPR and its impacts https://schedule.icann.org/event/B3ot/gdpr-and-its-potential-impact-looking-for-practical-solutions >>> Best, >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2017-06-28 19:46 GMT+09:00 Maryant Fernandez Perez : >>> >>>> Hi Ayden & all, >>>> >>>> Some of EDRi members may be willing to provide input, as in EDRi we have extensively worked on the GDPR and in its implementation. >>>> I'm aware the the official deadline is 7 July. >>>> What's the last internal deadline to comment on it? >>>> >>>> Thanks and best regards, >>>> Maryant >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Maryant Fernandez Perez >>>> Senior Policy Advisor >>>> European Digital Rights (EDRi) >>>> 20 Rue Belliard >>>> 1040 Brussels (Belgium) >>>> https://edri.org >>>> Tel: >>>> [+32 2 274 25 70](tel:+32%202%20274%2025%2070) >>>> PGP: D59A 1D3F 50CC 231B DCFE 3F2C 92FA 6F29 3D74 0B42 >>>> @edri | @maryantfp >>>> >>>> Donate to EDRi! >>>> https://edri.org/donate/ >>>> Subscribe to the EDRi-gram, our fortnightly roundup of digital rights news! >>>> http://edri.org/newsletters/ >>>> >>>> Le 14/06/17 ? 00:05, Ayden F?rdeline a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> I have revised our draft comment on the effectiveness of the updated ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Paragraphs 3 and 7, in particular, are new. Your review of and feedback on this proposed comment is warmly welcomed. The submission deadline is 7 July, but I am hoping we may be able to finalise the comment before this date, given we have ICANN 59 approaching in just over a week's time. Thank you! >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, Ayden F?rdeline >>>>> >>>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>>> Subject: [DRAFT] Potential NCSG Comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law >>>>>> Local Time: May 13, 2017 8:36 PM >>>>>> UTC Time: May 13, 2017 7:36 PM >>>>>> From: icann at FERDELINE.COM >>>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >>>>>> Dear colleagues, >>>>>> I have drafted a comment on behalf of the NCSG on the effectiveness of the updated [ICANN Procedure](https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-privacy-law-2017-05-03-en) for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. I warmly welcome your comments, suggestions, and edits so that we can strengthen this comment. >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lA-O2jiPv5JMoCYpG5HD0S_5O3yaiYkoRvfll3YsTX4/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>> The deadline for submission of comments on this topic is in 30 days, on 12 June. I would like to get this to the Policy Committee to review one week earlier, on 5 June, so I kindly ask that you make your comments before this time if you can please. Thanks! >>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ayden F?rdeline >>>>>> [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline) >> >> -- >> Maryant Fernandez Perez >> Senior Policy Advisor >> European Digital Rights (EDRi) >> 20 Rue Belliard >> 1040 Brussels (Belgium) >> https://edri.org >> Tel: +32 2 274 25 70 >> PGP: D59A 1D3F 50CC 231B DCFE 3F2C 92FA 6F29 3D74 0B42 >> @edri | @maryantfp >> >> Donate to EDRi! >> https://edri.org/donate/ >> Subscribe to the EDRi-gram, our fortnightly roundup of digital rights news! >> http://edri.org/newsletters/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wendy at seltzer.org Fri Jun 30 07:43:49 2017 From: wendy at seltzer.org (Wendy Seltzer) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:43:49 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-PC] ICANN GDPR Compliance Consultation Group In-Reply-To: <20170630043119.bliuwcnvnwbwa6fi@roller.tarvainen.info> References: <20170630043119.bliuwcnvnwbwa6fi@roller.tarvainen.info> Message-ID: <20170630044349.GA25917@mail.seltzer.org> Thanks Tapani, The group met briefly during the week and will meet by phone next Thursday. Its minimal task is to prepare information from which to ask European DPAs for review of WHOIS/RDS data elements with respect to the personal data protections of GDPR. We're currently gathering use cases for all users and data elements. We should be aiming to describe those of interest to non-commercial users, including academic research and end-user inquiries. --Wendy On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:31:19AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: >Dear PC, > >For the record, new GDPR/RDS task force, officially called > >ICANN GDPR Compliance Consultation Group > >was formed very quickly during ICANN59, and after some >negotiation they agreed to have three NCSG members there. >We did not have time to call a formal PC meeting to >select them, but discussions with those present there >and over Skype quickly found agreement to select these: > >Stephanie Perrin >Wendy Seltzer >Ayden Ferdeline > >I'm sure they will do an excellent job. > >-- >Tapani Tarvainen >_______________________________________________ >NCSG-PC mailing list >NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc