[NCSG-PC] Board member election process and timeline

[Ayden Férdeline]

My preference would be for a special meeting of the GNSO Council, which would potentially give us another two weeks to use as part of the candidate selection process. However, I realise this would be a burden on all of the GNSO Councillors.

In any case, two days is not realistic for interviewing all of the candidates.



Ayden Férdeline
[linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline)



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Board member election process and timeline
Local Time: 14 February 2017 6:46 PM
UTC Time: 14 February 2017 18:46
From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
To: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is

Dear PC members,

As I hope everyone is already aware, we need to agree with CSG on the
timeline and process for NCPH Board member election.

We had a session today about it here in Reykjavík without conclusion,
but it really needs to be decided within a few days.

I'll attach the latest staff proposal. As things stand the only thing
there almost everybody agrees should be changed is the interview time:
two days is too short to ensure all candidates can be interviewed.
Otherwise feeling is that it doesn't really matter much - we can do it
in the time we have.

I will note that the 10 April deadline there isn't stonehard, it is
possible to have an extra council meeting even on 3 May if need be to
get two extra weeks, but it would obviously not be particularly desirable.

Comments welcome. While we can't decide this alone, we can decide
what we can accept and then people here can work it out with CSG.

--
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170214/30276ddc/attachment.htm>