[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Re: [council] FOR REVIEW/COMMENTS: Draft GNSO Council response on gTLD policy issues in the GAC Copenhagen Communique

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

We need some feedback for GNSO response to GAC communique  in particular
the redcross/IGO protection and the 2 caracteres country code at second
level, from those who have been following the issue closely

Best,

Rafik



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Date: Apr 22, 2017 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: [council] FOR REVIEW/COMMENTS: Draft GNSO Council response on
gTLD policy issues in the GAC Copenhagen Communique
To: "Mary Wong" <mary.wong at icann.org>, "GNSO Council List" <
council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc:

Councilors –



Please see attached for a revised version of this comment document.  Note
that due to a configuration error, I appear as both “James Bladel” and
“Microsoft User”.   I’ve attempted to clarify existing comments, but I
believe we still have some work to do in item #2 (IGO Protections).  I’m
good with the other elements of the comment.



As we are attempting to hit a short deadline, please review and provide
your comments as soon as possible.  I will then work with Staff to (a)
restructure this document in the form of a letter that can be sent to the
Board and (b) prepare a new formal motion for consideration at or before
our next meeting.



Thank you,



J.





*From: *<council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <
mary.wong at icann.org>
*Date: *Friday, April 21, 2017 at 10:18
*To: *GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
*Subject: *[council] FOR REVIEW/COMMENTS: Draft GNSO Council response on
gTLD policy issues in the GAC Copenhagen Communique



Dear Councilors,



As discussed on the Council call yesterday, please find attached the
current draft of a possible GNSO Council response to the gTLD policy issues
raised in the GAC’s Copenhagen Communique. Staff had taken the liberty,
when assisting the group of Council volunteers on this effort, of inserting
certain comments and suggestions that are also reflected in the document.



Please review the document and send your comments and suggestions to this
mailing list. As noted on the Council call, the Board’s call with the GAC
on the Communique is scheduled for 27 April, so it will be ideal if the
Council chairs are in a position to send a note generally highlighting the
Council’s views before that date, with a view toward formal Council
adoption of the final text at the Council’s next meeting in mid-May.



Thanks and cheers

Mary

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170422/66e36b99/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JMB--GNSO Council Review of GAC Communique - CPH - 13 April 2017.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 33451 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170422/66e36b99/attachment.docx>