[NCSG-PC] SSC process and my status in NCSG PC

[William Drake]

Good morning

As another observer who’s been watching from the sidelines in astonishment, FWIW let me say that I agree with Avri’s posts yesterday:

> I might add that I see no problem with continuing for a while with just
> 2 members in the SSC.  That is one of the advantages of the SSC
> requiring full consensus.

I’d let the SSC get on with its business with the two solid reps you’ve chosen.  If people feel the universe absolutely requires us to have three, I'd give it a good rest and focus on other work to rebuild normality before trying.

> As an observer from the outside, I do not believe the process was
> flawed, what was flawed was the lack of trust and the behavior of some
> individuals.  And no process is going to account for that.


IMO the only significant procedural flaw concerned transparency.  The VC changing jobs was amenable to a quick fix and didn’t require him to leave.  

As for all the hyper-heated verbiage I’ve read in the past couple days, wow, yikes, holy cow, etc.  

> If you really want to understand what went on, request an ombudsman
> investigation to truly air all the dirty laundry so that you can start
> process building with a clean slate and understanding of the fault lines. 


I hate to say it but this might be advisable before trying again…if you could really agree on how to request and pursue it.

Good luck to us all,

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170407/584002b0/attachment.htm>