[PC-NCSG] Draft motion for Council: reject the IAG conflicts with law implementation report and start a new pdp to revise the policy

[Stephanie Perrin]

I did, and I sent it to the registrars and registries.  I think we will 
get support, and if not we will have started the conversation.

Thanks!!

cheers Steph


On 2016-09-19 20:54, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> I am not sure where we are on the deadline, but I truly hope you 
> did/do send this motion. It is extremely important and timely. Tx you 
> for drafting.
>
> Kathy
>
>
> On 9/19/2016 7:10 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>
>> My apologies for the lateness of this draft, I mentioned it earlier 
>> today on the council skype channel, and we did discuss this issue at 
>> the last policy meeting.  As I said then, we need to look at this 
>> antique policy, not revise the trigger. Trying to get it in in the 
>> next hour, will submit on my own if there is no support but my 
>> impression from the last meeting was that noone disagreed with the logic.
>>
>> Let me know please, I am trying to hit the 23:59 UTC deadline. 
>> Michele Neylon and Volker Greimann of the Registrars group have 
>> responded positively.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160919/162322a6/attachment.html>