[PC-NCSG] Results for PC deliberation Fwd: Call for expressions of interest CSCG and GNSO Review WG

Thu Sep 8 12:27:43 EEST 2016

Dear all,

As I mentioned before, I contacted NCSG volunteers in the GNSO Review WG
and Rafik agreed to be NCSG principal rep with Avri as alternate. I will
communicate this to staff.

I will also forward David's name, selected to the CSCG.

Thanks
Marilia

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello everyone, since there were no views expressed in contrary, I will
> contact the three NCSG volunteers to the GNSO Review WG.
> Thanks
> Marilia
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> As you know, calls were issued on the list asking for volunteers who
>> would be willing to represent NCSG in the: a) Civil Society Coordination
>> Group (CSCG) and b) GNSO Review WG (please see more details in the e-mail
>> forwarded below). The NCSG PC is now expected to make a decision with
>> regards to filling these positions.
>>
>> 1) For the CSCG:
>> We received one SOI, put forward by David Cake.  If there are no
>> objections, I will proceed with forwarding David's name to the CSCG.
>>
>> 2) for the GNSO Review WG
>> We received one SOI, put forward by Avri Doria, to act as alternate NCSG
>> rep on this WG. If there are no objections, Avri will be appointed as our
>> alternate.
>>
>> We still need to appoint a *primary NCSG representative* in this WG.
>> Given that the selection of these names is overdue, I suggest that we
>> consult the other three NCSG members who have volunteered to be part of
>> this WG and ask them if any of them would like to serve as NCSG primary
>> rep. They are:
>> Rafik Dammak
>> Pascal Bekono
>> Amr Elsadr
>>
>> If there is no other suggested approach, I will write them tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marilia
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:53 AM
>> Subject: Call for expressions of interest CSCG and GNSO Review WG
>> To: NCSG List <ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Dear members of NCSG,
>>
>>
>>
>> Our stakeholder group needs to select representatives for two positions:
>>
>> 1. One representative at the Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG)
>>
>> 2. Two members (primary and alternate) to the GNSO Review Working Group
>>
>>
>>
>> This is call for volunteers who would be willing to serve on these
>> positions. Statements of Interest should be sent to the NCSG list until the *4th of
>> September 23:59 UTC*. Please on the subject line: "SOI [your name] CSCG"
>> or "SOI [your name] GNSO review".
>>
>>
>>
>> The selection process will be conducted by the members of the NCSG Policy
>> Committee by means of finding rough consensus. The criteria that will be
>> used to evaluate the candidates is explained in each of the sections below.
>>
>>
>>
>> * CSCG - MEMBER REPRESENTATIVES*
>>
>>
>>
>> For more info about the job of the CSCG, please do refer to their website
>> <http://internetgov-cs.org/>.
>>
>>
>>
>> The new CSCG Rep will serve for a period of 2 years starting September
>> 2016 (to September 2018) and I will be stepping down from this role next
>> year (in September 2017) after we have elected a new Co-coordinator in
>> replacement of Analia (whose term expires in January 2017).
>>
>>
>>
>> Description:
>>
>> This position will not always require much of your time though it can
>> happen during Nomcoms or working groups. So we need someone who knows a lot
>> about IGF, MAG selection process and understands civil society in the IG
>> area as a whole. We need someone who has been active on the IGC for quite a
>> while and who can speak our positions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Role of Representatives:
>>
>> The duties of members are to:
>>
>> 1. Consider the interests of civil society as a whole,
>>
>> 2. Serve on Nomcoms regularly as required,
>>
>> 3. Communicate with their coalitions on CSCG developments.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Statement of Interest (SOI) will have this info:
>>
>> ? Name, declared region of residence, gender and employment
>>
>> ? Reasons for willingness to take on this task (max 200 words)
>>
>> ? Qualifications for this position (max 200 words)
>>
>> ? Statement of availability for the time the position requires (max 200
>> words)
>>
>> ? The nominee?s statement may also include any other information the
>> candidate believes in relevant (max 200 words).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *MEMBERS IN GNSO REVIEW WORKING GROUP*
>>
>>
>>
>> *In Brief*
>>
>>
>>
>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council adopted the
>> Charter
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf> of
>> the GNSO Review Working Group during its meeting on 21 July 2016. This
>> Working Group is tasked to develop an implementation plan for the GNSO
>> Review recommendations
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf> which
>> were recently adopted
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-06-25-en#2.e> by
>> the ICANN Board. This is the Call for Volunteers to join this Working
>> Group. Anyone interested in the GNSO Review and contributing to the
>> development of the implementation plan and subsequent implementation is
>> encouraged to volunteer.
>>
>>
>>
>> *What This Working Group Will Do*
>>
>>
>>
>> Per the GNSO Review Working Group Charter
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf> the
>> GNSO Review Working Group will be responsible for developing an
>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the
>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to measure current
>> state as well as progress toward the desired outcome for the GNSO Review
>> recommendations adopted by the ICANN Board (thirty-four (34)
>> recommendations of the Final Report
>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf> of
>> the Independent Examiner (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>> recommendations 23 and 32). This implementation plan is to be submitted for
>> approval to the GNSO Council, followed by consideration by the ICANN Board.
>> Following the approval of the implementation plan, the Working Group is
>> also expected to execute and oversee the implementation of the GNSO Review
>> recommendations unless specified differently in the implementation plan.
>>
>>
>>
>> The GNSO Review Working Group will also be responsible for considering
>> any new requests by the GNSO Council concerning issues related to the
>> GNSO Council processes and procedures and to Working Group guidelines that
>> have been identified either by the GNSO Council, or a group chartered by
>> the GNSO Council, as needing discussion. However, the first priority of the
>> Working Group will be the development of an implementation plan and the
>> subsequent implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Timeline and Deliverables
>>
>>
>>
>> The GNSO Review Working Group is expected to deliver the implementation
>> plan to the GNSO Council for consideration at the GNSO Council meeting at
>> ICANN57 at the latest in order to meet the Board set objective of ?an
>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the
>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to measure current
>> state as well as progress toward the desired outcome, shall be submitted to
>> the Board as soon as possible, but no later than six (6) months after the
>> adoption of this resolution?i.e., December 2016.
>>
>>
>>
>> *How to Join*
>>
>>
>>
>> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and/or Constituency will identify one primary
>> and one alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review Working Group. In
>> addition to these appointed members, anyone interested will be able to join
>> this working group as a participant or observer.  Please note that
>> participants are expected to attend conference calls and to actively
>> participate in online discussions.  Observers can follow the group's work
>> on the mailing list but can neither send to the mailing list nor
>> participate actively in the calls.
>>
>>
>>
>> NCSG policy committee will conduct a selection of the primary and
>> alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review Working Group. *Please,
>> include in your statement of interest*:
>>
>> 1.    Knowledge or practical experience with GNSO?s policy development
>> process
>>
>> 2.    Knowledge of GNSO?s operational procedures
>>
>> 3.   Previous experience in other GNSO working groups or in working with
>> other stakeholder groups.
>>
>> 4.   Comment on your time and availability to engage in GNSO review
>> working group.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Further information and preparation*
>>
>>
>>
>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are encouraged
>> to review the following materials:
>>
>> GNSO Review Recommendations
>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>
>>
>> Independent Examiner Final Report
>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>
>>
>> Frequently Asked Questions <https://community.icann.org/x/UBCbAw>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160908/6aa9f4c0/attachment-0001.html>