[PC-NCSG] GNSO Vice Chair selection

Amr Elsadr aelsadr
Wed Oct 12 12:50:19 EEST 2016


Hi,

I agree with Avri. Also, this process doesn?t take into consideration what would happen if the GNSO Chair was from the NCPH. This should also be considered. Doesn?t make sense to me to have both a Chair and a Vice-Chair from the same SG.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 1:26 PM, avri doria <avri at APC.ORG> wrote:
> 
> 
> point 8 is a problem.
> 
> that is where they nailed us last time.
> 
> if they dont accept the first offered candidate, then the selecting SG
> should just select again. 
> 
> this is a bad deal, i recommend you do not accept.
> 
> 
> avrio
> 
> 
> 
> On 11-Oct-16 22:17, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Following up the discussion during our policy call about GNSO VC
>> selection, I got the following proposal from the CSG. It looks pretty
>> good to me, although there're some details that need more work.
>> 
>> Comments welcome.
>> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg





More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list