[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG

Mon Oct 3 22:08:39 EEST 2016

Forgive me if this has already been forwarded for comments.  We should 
take a look at it....

stephanie

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD 
Auction Proceeds CCWG
Date: 	Fri, 30 Sep 2016 23:42:41 +0000
From: 	Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
To: 	Paul McGrady <policy at paulmcgrady.com>, 'James M. Bladel' 
<jbladel at godaddy.com>, 'GNSO Council List' <council at gnso.icann.org>
CC: 	jrobinson at afilias.info <jrobinson at afilias.info>

Paul, just to clarify, the charter does not set out the ?process to 
spend these windfalls?, it outlines the scope for the CCWG that is 
expected to develop the framework for disbursements of funds. Also, to 
provide a bit more background on the process and community deliberations 
that have lead up to this proposed charter:

*March 2015*: GNSO Chair Jonathan Robinson wrote to SO/AC Chairs to take 
temperature on the desire for a drafting team to discuss the development 
of a CCWG

*June 2015*: ICANN53, in Buenos Aires: SO/AC Panel High Interest Session 
and Community Workshop Session

*July - August 2015*: Development of Discussion Paper Drafted to take 
into consideration pertinent issues discussed at ICANN53

*September 2015*: Discussion Paper is published for public comment

*December 2015*: Discussion Paper Comments Report published along with 
updated Discussion Paper

*January - February 2016*: Requests for nominations to Drafting Team for 
CCWG, Board Chair nominates Board Liaisons, First Call of Drafting Team/Feb

*March ? September 2016*: Drafting Team work, including review of all 
the materials and input leading up to the DT, distribution of draft 
charter for review and discussion prior to ICANN56, community session 
during ICANN56, review of all comments received during ICANN56 as well 
as those submitted subsequently by email (see comment review tool at 
https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw) 
<https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw%29>,

*13 September 2016*: Submission of proposed charter to ICANN SO/ACs with 
the request to identify any pertinent issues that would prevent SO/AC 
adoption

Of course, I will take your suggestion for a public comment period back 
to the DT, but I also wanted to remind the Council that the DT has 
specifically requested input on whether there are any pertinent issues 
that would avoid adoption of the charter by SO/ACs to be able to address 
these prior to formally submitting the proposed charter to the ICANN 
SO/ACs for their consideration. The idea of the DT was to obtain this 
input by the end of September so it would be in a position to make any 
updates to the proposed charter, if needed, which would allow for formal 
submission of the proposed charter in time for consideration by the 
different SO/ACs at ICANN57. For your convenience, I?ve attached the 
proposed charter here again.

Best regards,

Marika

*Marika Konings*

Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation 
for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Email: marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>

//

/Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO/

/Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses 
<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer 
pages 
<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>./

*From: *<owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Paul McGrady 
<policy at paulmcgrady.com>
*Date: *Friday 30 September 2016 at 14:47
*To: *"James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>, 'GNSO Council List' 
<council at gnso.icann.org>
*Cc: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
*Subject: *RE: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD 
Auction Proceeds CCWG

All,

Just to follow on from my comments yesterday, it is my personal belief 
(and not necessarily the view of the IPC, but not necessarily not the 
view either) that this Charter should be open to a real and robust 
public comment ? not just to those with the time and resources to have 
traveled to Helsinki. There is no rush to disburse these funds 
(correct?), so sending the message to the public that ICANN doesn?t want 
their opinion on the correct process to spend these windfalls, I 
believe, is an avoidable mistake.

Regards,

Paul

Paul D. McGrady, Jr.

policy at paulmcgrady.com

*From:*owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *James M. Bladel
*Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2016 3:37 PM
*To:* GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
*Subject:* [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD 
Auction Proceeds CCWG

Councilors -

See message below, sent on behalf of the gTLD Auction Proceeds Charter 
Drafting Team.  Their Draft Charter for a proposed CCWG is attached, and 
they are requesting feedback by 30 September. If time allows, lets plan 
to add this as a discussion point for our next call (29 SEP).

Thank you,

J.

*From: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org 
<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
*Date: *Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 12:41
*Subject: *For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG

Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds 
Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair:

Dear SO/AC Chairs,

On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are 
delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed 
charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction 
Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart 
from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), 
participated in the DT deliberations (see 
https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw[community.icann.org] 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_AR-5FAAw&d=DQMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=iAY_2l3SjGAHTqDmvf4-BRjt5u-4mMSRKLF4dIbyRyg&s=_1AnbhFDSNAN1ovGptiyqxnN6icRMnadePMqCwXlits&e=> 
for DT members).

This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and 
deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as 
part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see 
https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_fgmbAw-29&d=DQMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=iAY_2l3SjGAHTqDmvf4-BRjt5u-4mMSRKLF4dIbyRyg&s=n69ktxIEQG7E4ISa1cn1gzCR6cTytVoUIG_OGXY9U3w&e=> 
and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different 
viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the 
ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request 
you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and 
only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your 
respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request 
you highlight such pertinent issues *_by 30 September 2016 at the 
latest_*, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective 
SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 
30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by 
any of the ICANN SO/ACs.

Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not 
hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving 
your feedback.

Best wishes,

Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161003/df373418/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCWG Auction Proceeds - clean - FINAL Charter - 9 September 2016.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 61324 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161003/df373418/attachment-0001.docx>