[PC-NCSG] Vice Chair elections

Mon Nov 7 12:48:45 EET 2016

Option 1 for me, too.
Stefania

________________________________________
Da: PC-NCSG <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> per conto di Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>
Inviato: luned? 7 novembre 2016 11.43.59
A: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Oggetto: Re: [PC-NCSG] Vice Chair elections

Thank you Marilia.

By my count now we have Matthew, Stephanie and Marilia supporting
option 1 (no VC) and Stefania and Ed hedging their bets.

Of observers Avri and Bill support 1 as well.

I'm happy with 1, too.

Enough for me. Given the urgency of this I'll call it done
unless someone objects within half an hour.

Tapani

On Nov 07 11:34, Marilia Maciel (mariliamaciel at gmail.com) wrote:

> Option 1 would be my preference. Thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
> > wrote:
>
> > Dear PC members,
> >
> > Please express your preferences quickly. We really need
> > to decide this fast.
> >
> > In the end I don't think this matters all that much, either
> > option will work as an incentive to resolve the issue,
> > which is the main point.
> >
> > --
> > Tapani Tarvainen
> >
> > On Nov 06 23:24, Stephanie Perrin (stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I believe it will politicize the NCAs even more than they already are.
> > Yes
> > > it is unfortunate that selecting option 1 puts pressure on the chair and
> > the
> > > other vice chair....but it does not trouble me that they will be putting
> > > pressure on our house to get its act together.
> > >
> > > SP
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2016-11-06 21:12, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > > > One additional point here I forgot to mention: in option 2
> > > > there's the NCA clause, so if CSG tries to play dirty we
> > > > could invoke that and have the NCA as VC until they give up.
> > > >
> > > > Of course some future NCA might be disastrous but still
> > > > I don't see option 2 being any better for CSG than for us.
> > > >
> > > > Tapani
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 06 14:46, Tapani Tarvainen (ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Avri,
> > > > >
> > > > > Your point is good, but the situation would be reverse in the
> > > > > next round - in the long term it'd balance out.
> > > > >
> > > > > And I really don't think CSG would reject our candidate simply
> > > > > because it'd give them "half VC" ever after.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tapani
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 06 14:30, avri doria (avri at apc.org) wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you go with option 1, you can assume that there will be no
> > v-chair in
> > > > > > after Heather completes her term.  Whereas if you go with option 2
> > you
> > > > > > can assume that there will be alternating short term v-chairs,
> > which
> > > > > > means they would get every other temp slot - thus to their
> > advantage.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I recommend option 1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > avri
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 06-Nov-16 14:19, matthew shears wrote:
> > > > > > > so... I don't like inconsistencies from meeting to meeting and
> > would
> > > > > > > rather have pressure of no NCPH VC
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 06/11/2016 08:45, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > > > > > > > FYI: CSG accepts whichever of the two alternatives for step 12
> > we
> > > > > > > > want. If we can agree on it that is. :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To recap, the choices were like this:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > 12. If no agreement is reached in time for a council meeting,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [there will be no NCPH Vice Chair in that meeting]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [the non-incumbent SG nominates VC candidate for that meeting
> > only,
> > > > > > > > the other SG may only reject the candidate in favour of the
> > NCA;
> > > > > > > > should the situation reoccur, the nomination would alternate
> > > > > > > > between SGs from meeting to meeting]
> > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tapani
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from tonyarholmes
> > > > > > > > <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com> -----
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear Tapani
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First, thanks for the constructive discussion during this
> > morning's NCPH
> > > > > > > > meeting. Within the CSG we have since discussed how best to
> > progress the
> > > > > > > > remaining unresolved issue on point 12 and reach conclusion.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The CSG would therefore like to propose that  the NCSG selects
> > its
> > > > > > > > preferred
> > > > > > > > approach on Point 12 and we would be willing to concur with
> > that choice.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could you please let us know your decision.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tony
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Mar?lia Maciel*
> Digital Policy Senior Researcher, DiploFoundation
>
> WMO Building *|* 7bis, Avenue de la Paix *| *1211 Geneva - Switzerland
> *Tel *+41 (0) 22 9073632 *| *
> *Email*: *MariliaM at diplomacy.edu <mariliam at diplomacy.edu>* *|** Twitter: *
> *@MariliaM*

_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.