[PC-NCSG] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

[Marilia Maciel]

Hi all, following the support on the NCSG list to endorsing the proposal
from IAB on RDAP, I would like to start a call for consensus on the PC
list. Please, let me know in the next 6 hours if you have objections to
endorsing IAB's proposal and if you have suggestions to the text below:

Comments from the Non-commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) on the public
comment period related to the "Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars"



Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the Registration
Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and
Registrars.



The NCSG would like to give support to the points that have been raised by
the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) in their contribution to this
consultation, which can be found at:
https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html



Particularly, the NCSG would like to stress the importance of specifying
the RDAP Profile in a way that leaves the broadest range of options to the
PDP on next-generation gTLD registration directory services from a policy
perspective.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Best wishes,
Mar?lia

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Desiree Miloshevic <
dmiloshevic at afilias.info> wrote:

> I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.
> While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I do
> find that
> google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g.  not to offer public access
> to the data.
>
> >>>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf
>
> The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and
> let registries/registrars
> deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the
> rest.
>
> So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing
> (differentiated) access to the data immediately?
> Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...
>
> Desiree
> --
>
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it?s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is
> today, 23:59 UTC.
> >> Best wishes
> >> M
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
> wrote:
> >> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
> >>
> >> --Wendy
> >>
> >> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> >>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
> >>>
> >>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
> >>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It
> would
> >>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
> >>> share their views on the next hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Mar?lia
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
> >>>> Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
> >>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts
> that
> >>>>> matter to us.
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Shane
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mar?lia Maciel
> >> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito
> Rio
> >> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> >> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> >> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> >> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> >>
> >>
>
>


-- 
*Mar?lia Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160318/b30e3758/attachment-0001.html>