[PC-NCSG] Public comment period on Implementation of Thick Whois rec#1 closing 18/03

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

I haven?t been paying nearly as much attention to the ?thick? whois IRT as I should have. But my understanding is that right now, they are seeking community input on the implementation of consistent labelling and display across all gTLDs, not the privacy and data protection legal review bit. So I?m not sure whether or not we want to send a comment in. I hope I?m not wrong.

One thing I did notice in the implementation framework they are suggesting is that they plan on using RDAP in this part of the ?thin? to ?thick? transition. They also say that it is necessary to do so, and that using RDAP was one of the consensus policy outputs of ?thick? whois. Honestly, I don?t remember that being the case at all, but I was less focused on this charter question, and more focused on others.

I would welcome thoughts on this, although time is a bit tight if we want to draft and endorse some kind of statement.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
> Short answer, yes.
> Amr, help!  you were on thick WHOIS?  
> Stephanie
> 
> On 2016-03-16 16:36, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> Hello everyone, 
>> 
>> The deadline to present inputs to the public comment period on the Proposed Implementation of GNSO Thick Whois Consensus Policy Requiring Consistent Labeling and Display of RDDS (Whois) Output for All gTLDs is closing 18/03. 
>> 
>> This Public Comment Period focuses on the proposed implementation of Recommendation #1 of Thick Whois, concerning the consistent labeling and display of Whois output for all gTLDs. Recommendation #1 of the Thick Whois states: "The provision of thick Whois services, with a consistent labeling and display as per the model outlined in specification 3 of the 2013 RAA, should become a requirement for all gTLD registries, both existing and future."
>> 
>> More information can be found in: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en
>> 
>> To our NCSG members and particularly to those of us following privacy discussions more closely, is there any comment that we would like to present? Is anyone writing an individual comment and would like to share with the group? 
>> 
>> Maybe this comment could be written in conjunction with the one on RDAP. 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Mar?lia
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mar?lia Maciel
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>> 
>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> 
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg