[PC-NCSG] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03
Marilia Maciel
mariliamaciel
Thu Mar 17 19:53:43 EET 2016
Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
share their views on the next hours.
Thanks!
Mar?lia
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>
wrote:
> All,
>
> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
> Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
> > technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
> > matter to us.
>
> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Shane
>
--
*Mar?lia Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160317/10b52097/attachment.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list