[PC-NCSG] Revised IPC Motion

[Tapani Tarvainen]

On Jun 29 11:40, Matthew Shears (mshears at cdt.org) wrote:

> 2. The Drafting Team shall comprise those volunteers from the GNSO
> community which are identified by their Constituencies and
> Stakeholder Groups who express interests*and/or have a* [can
> demonstrate reasonable] knowledge of or experience with the process
> of revising the ICANN Bylaws _or GNSO operating procedures_.
> Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups are requested to identify
> volunteers by letter to the GNSCO Council Chair by 22 July 2016.

Question: who should they demonstrate their knowledge or experience?

To me such language suggests SGs/constituencies would not be allowed
to choose their own representatives but only suggest then for someone
higher up to approve, or not.

> If we want this to be done at the SG level do we need/want a reference to
> constituencies?

Don't we want language to ensure there will be enough our people,
that is, something explicitly specifying equal numbers by SG
(by constituency count we'd lose)?

Or am I missing something?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen