[PC-NCSG] fw: [council] MOTION TO CREATE A DRAFTING TEAM TO FURTHER DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE GNSO'S NEW ROLES AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REVISED ICANN BYLAWS

[Stephanie Perrin]

I think leaving it in Council is a good idea, lets see if we can get the 
registrars to support the idea....and fast.  We have an opportunity to 
do a little lobbying at the COuncil dinner.  ANyone know where the BC 
sits on this issue?

SP


On 2016-06-23 22:48, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> A belated response, Ed, that this is very concerning. I think it will 
> wind up with things "stacked" in favor of the IPC. Sigh. I support 
> your idea of leaving this matter in Council - and hope we can discuss 
> it at the NCSG Policy session on Tuesday.
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 6/20/2016 2:03 PM, Edward Morris wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> Attached please find an IPC Motion to create a drafting team to 
>> develop GNSO responses to changes brought by the transition.
>> This is a different approach that what has previously been discussed. 
>> What concerns me is the possibility under this plan for the NCSG to 
>> be inadequately represented on the proposed drafting team. It would 
>> appear to be an open call for volunteers with the following 
>> qualifications:
>> -
>>
>>  1. The Drafting Team shall comprise volunteers from the GNSO
>>     community who can demonstrate reasonable knowledge of or
>>     experience with the process of revising the ICANN Bylaws.
>>
>> I might like that language if I were from a constituency composed 
>> principally of lawyers such as the IPC.
>> I would prefer to have Council, working with staff, to make the 
>> needed changes. We have a fairly collegial working environment 
>> and the expertise to get this done in a fairly time efficient manner 
>> with full representation of all stakeholder groups. If we are going 
>> to farm this out I'd suggest we need to insist on equal 
>> representation of all stakeholder groups on the Drafting Team with 
>> appointments being made directly by the SG's themselves according to 
>> their own criteria.
>> Thoughts?
>> Best,
>> Ed
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From*: "Paul McGrady" <policy at paulmcgrady.com>
>> *Sent*: Monday, June 20, 2016 6:35 PM
>> *To*: council at gnso.icann.org
>> *Cc*: "Glen de Saint G?ry" <Glen at icann.org>, mary.wong at icann.org, 
>> "Heather Forrest" <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>
>> *Subject*: [council] MOTION TO CREATE A DRAFTING TEAM TO FURTHER 
>> DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE GNSO'S NEW ROLES AND 
>> OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REVISED ICANN BYLAWS
>>
>> Dear Council Colleagues:
>>
>> As we all know, making the Empowered Community a reality is going to 
>> take a lot of effort by everyone.  To get us started in that process, 
>> attached please find a MOTION TO CREATE A DRAFTING TEAM TO FURTHER 
>> DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE GNSO?S NEW ROLES AND 
>> OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REVISED ICANN BYLAWS which is being proposed by 
>> the IPC for consideration at the next GNSO Council meeting in 
>> Helsinki.  Safe travels!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Paul McGrady
>>
>> GNSO Councilor for the IPC
>>
>> policy at paulmcgrady.com <mailto:policy at paulmcgrady.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160623/4ec89f7c/attachment-0001.html>