[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] International Registration Data (IRD) - Expert WG Report and Proposed Council Actions

[Stephanie Perrin]

And another much more complex report which the GNSO has been asked to 
review for policy issues.  Since Amr and Rudi were on the translation 
and transliteration PDP, they are no doubt much more able than I to 
explain potential policy issues, but I thought I would lose no time in 
forwarding to you.  Personally, I think I need on a webinar on this one, 
so will ask if there is one they did at any point.  Very complex stuff.

Stephanie Perrin



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[council] International Registration Data (IRD) - Expert WG 
Report and Proposed Council Actions
Date: 	Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:19:27 +0000
From: 	James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
To: 	GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>



Council Colleagues -

Last month we received a letter (attached) from the ICANN Board, 
requesting that the GNSO Council analyze the Final Report from the 2012 
WHOIS Expert Working Group for policy implications (IRD Final Report 
<https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/ird-expert-wg-final-23sep15-en.pdf>), 
and forward this report and our concerns to the appropriate PDP working 
groups, including the Next Generation RDS PDP working group at a minimum.

To move this task forward, here are the steps I propose:

 1. That the Council, forward the IRD Final Report to the RDS PDP
    chairs, with the request that this PDP WG consider these
    recommendations within the context of that policy development work.
      And that they report to us (via their Council Liaison) any
    elements of the IRD Recommendations that they believe to be
    incompatible with their Charter, or beyond the scope of a GNSO PDP,
    *and*
 2. That the Council also forward the IRD Final Report to the former
    chairs of the recently-completed Translation & Transliteration
    Working Group, with the request that they (along with support from
    Policy Staff) analyze the IRD Recommendations against the adopted
    Recommendations of their PDP (see Staff-prepared table, attached).
      And that they report back to the Council with their assessment of
    whether or not these recommendations were adequately covered by the
    PDP, or if there are any omissions or incompatibilities, *and*
 3. That we reply to the letter from Steve & the Board, acknowledge
    receipt of this request, and inform them of actions taken.

I?d welcome any additional thoughts on this topic, or the proposed path 
forward.  This is an extraordinarily complex topic, with numerous 
dependencies and moving parts, so please don?t hesitate to raise any 
questions or concerns.


Thank you,

J.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Bladel


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160619/a1381b59/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2016-05-11-Steve-Crocker-to-James-Bladel-IRD-Board-Review-Request.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 491807 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160619/a1381b59/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TTIRDSyncTable.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 113153 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160619/a1381b59/attachment-0001.docx>