[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of Incorporation?

Wed Jul 6 23:42:28 EEST 2016

hi matt this is what i sent yday. apparently my messages dont get thru thePC list...

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Milan, Stefania" <Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu<mailto:Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>>
Date: July 5, 2016 at 21:12:27 GMT+2
To: "pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org<mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org>" <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org<mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org>>
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of Incorporation?

Hi Matt, thanks for taking the initiative and prompting us to react. I went through the document and agree with Tatiana's suggestions; I only added a few changes. I wonder, however, whether there is a wording we might directly opposed to the "from time to time" (rather than simply proposing to get rid of it). But I am no native speaker, and have no actual suggestion, so I supposed it can go as it is.
Thanks again, Stefania

________________________________________
Da: PC-NCSG <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org<mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org>> per conto di Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de<mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>>
Inviato: marted? 5 luglio 2016 14.39.45
A: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org<mailto:pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>
Oggetto: Re: [PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of Incorporation?

Hi Matt,

thanks for taking the initiative! I suggested some changes to the doc, not related to the substance. Feel free to reject them. I fully support the comment.

Warm regards

Tanya

On 05/07/16 00:22, matthew shears wrote:

Dear all

I would draw your attention to the message below from one of our members and to the proposed comments I had circulated earlier through Trello and spearately.  At a minimum I believe that NCSG should comment on the issues related to GPI, as stated in the proposed draft text here in this google doc:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_0L_c5vCdksJ9TVzfCDoN5OesxJLiRmLwyqQtdLBdrY/edit?pref=2&pli=1

I look foward to your comments on this particular point and on any others related to the restated AoI you may wish to raise.  Please comment directly in the google doc.

The restated articles are here:

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-restated-articles-incorporation-25may16-en.pdf

The full consultation details can be found here:

https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-restated-articles-incorporation-2016-05-27-en

Thanks for your contributions.

Matthew

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of Incorporation?
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:42:05 +0000
From:   Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>><mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
To:     Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>><mailto:thomas at rickert.net>
CC:     Accountability Cross Community <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>><mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>

Thomas,

As stated in our public comment, I am concerned about the ambiguity of the AoI text on the global public interest. As I sent to the list last Sunday, I do not believe that Samantha's new text on the global public interest addresses the concerns raised in the June 20 call. Specifically, that the proposed phrasing leaves open the possibility that the GPI could at times be determined by non-bottom up multi-stakeholder process.

I suggest that the CCWG request the following text instead of Samantha's text circulated last Sunday: as such the global public interest shall be determined by the multistakeholder community through an inclusive bottom-up multistakeholder community process consistent with the mission set forth in the bylaws of the Corporation (?Bylaws?).

I believe that this text would remove any ambiguity about how GPI is determined.

I understand that this would be more controversial and not necessarily legally necessary, but I think that the AoI would be clearer if "organized" were replaced by "incorporated" or "organized and incorporated" and the location of the headquarters was inserted.

Best,

Brett

__________

On Jul 4, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Thomas Rickert <<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net><mailto:thomas at rickert.net>> wrote:

Dear all,
it was good to see many of you in Helsinki and I hope that you had safe trips back home.

We discussed the draft Articles of Incorporation during our last telco and agreed that Sam would send additional information to the list and all of us would then consider further whether or not all concerns have been removed.

Thanks to Sam for providing more information in the meantime.

With the end of the public comment period approaching rapidly, I would now like those of you who think we should raise concerns with a CCWG comment to write to the list within the next 24 hours (until 20.00 UTC on July 5th). Should any concerns raised get ssufficient traction to be considered a CCWG position, we will prepare a comment on that basis.

In any case, we will issue a brief CCWG comment supporting the draft either unconditionally or with any additional CCWG comments there might be based on the approach described above.

Thanks and kind regards,
Thomas

---
rickert.net<http://rickert.net><http://rickert.net>

________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org><http://heritage.org/>
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/ar94B3IW62RuD<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>

________________________________
[Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com><https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org<mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org><mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160706/66b44bc3/attachment-0001.html>