[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of Incorporation?

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin
Wed Jul 6 05:03:31 EEST 2016


I made a few grammaticals, likely am late for the train.  Showing as 
anonymous.  Thanks for doing this, it is a very important point.

Stephanie


On 2016-07-04 18:22, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> I would draw your attention to the message below from one of our 
> members and to the proposed comments I had circulated earlier through 
> Trello and spearately.  At a minimum I believe that NCSG should 
> comment on the issues related to GPI, as stated in the proposed draft 
> text here in this google doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_0L_c5vCdksJ9TVzfCDoN5OesxJLiRmLwyqQtdLBdrY/edit?pref=2&pli=1
>
> I look foward to your comments on this particular point and on any 
> others related to the restated AoI you may wish to raise. Please 
> comment directly in the google doc.
>
> The restated articles are here:
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-restated-articles-incorporation-25may16-en.pdf
>
> The full consultation details can be found here:
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-restated-articles-incorporation-2016-05-27-en
>
> Thanks for your contributions.
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comment on draft Articles of 
> Incorporation?
> Date: 	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:42:05 +0000
> From: 	Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
> To: 	Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>
> CC: 	Accountability Cross Community 
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Thomas,
>
> As stated in our public comment, I am concerned about the ambiguity of 
> the AoI text on the global public interest. As I sent to the list last 
> Sunday, I do not believe that Samantha's new text on the global public 
> interest addresses the concerns raised in the June 20 call. 
> Specifically, that the proposed phrasing leaves open the possibility 
> that the GPI could at times be determined by non-bottom up 
> multi-stakeholder process.
>
> I suggest that the CCWG request the following text instead of 
> Samantha's text circulated last Sunday: _as such the global public 
> interest shall be determined by the multistakeholder community through 
> an inclusive bottom-up multistakeholder community process consistent 
> with the mission set forth in the bylaws of the Corporation (?*Bylaws*?)._
>
> I believe that this text would remove any ambiguity about how GPI is 
> determined.
>
> I understand that this would be more controversial and not necessarily 
> legally necessary, but I think that the AoI would be clearer if 
> "organized" were replaced by "incorporated" or "organized and 
> incorporated" and the location of the headquarters was inserted.
>
> Best,
>
> Brett
>
> __________
>
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> it was good to see many of you in Helsinki and I hope that you had 
>> safe trips back home.
>>
>> We discussed the draft Articles of Incorporation during our last 
>> telco and agreed that Sam would send additional information to the 
>> list and all of us would then consider further whether or not all 
>> concerns have been removed.
>>
>> Thanks to Sam for providing more information in the meantime.
>>
>> With the end of the public comment period approaching rapidly, I 
>> would now like those of you who think we should raise concerns with a 
>> CCWG comment to write to the list within the next 24 hours (until 
>> 20.00 UTC on July 5th). Should any concerns raised get ssufficient 
>> traction to be considered a CCWG position, we will prepare a comment 
>> on that basis.
>>
>> In any case, we will issue a brief CCWG comment supporting the draft 
>> either unconditionally or with any additional CCWG comments there 
>> might be based on the approach described above.
>>
>> Thanks and kind regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>> ---
>> rickert.net <http://rickert.net>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BrettSchaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National 
> Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org 
>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/ar94B3IW62RuD 
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160705/faf85227/attachment.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list