[PC-NCSG] CCT

[Stephanie Perrin]

Good idea....
how do we do that...same deal, wrtie a letter I guess...
we can do a copy job of theirs....
SP
On 2016-01-16 12:56, Avri Doria wrote:
> Any chance he could be added as a expert?
>
> avri
>
>
> On 16-Jan-16 12:43, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> I think we have an excellent case for Jeremy.....show me the other
>> consumer advocates on the list. Stacy is very green to be thrown into
>> this fight if you ask me.  She may be excellent but this is going to
>> be heavy hitting, I dont think it is quite fair when we have noone
>> there besides Carlos and possibly Carlton to support her.
>> Stephanie
>>
>> On 2016-01-16 4:15, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>>> I'm afraid Ed is right here: we don't have a good case for
>>> pushing Jeremy at this point, but if we advocate Stacie
>>> we might succeed in either getting her in or blocking
>>> a BC candidate.
>>>
>>> Would someone have the time to write it up?
>>>
>>> Tapani
>>>
>>> On Jan 15 16:23, Edward Morris (egmorris1 at toast.net) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kathy,
>>>>
>>>> What's the hook?
>>>>
>>>> Simply saying we don't like the decision won't work. The BC has come
>>>> up with diversity. It's a shame Jeremy is not female but...
>>>>
>>>> My fear is if we don't do anything the BC will get their request. If
>>>> we send another female they probably won't change anything or they
>>>> could take both. Given they have already been accused of taking too
>>>> many men...
>>>>
>>>> Do you really think there is a chance they would take another man or
>>>> that suggesting they do would stop them from saying that the BC was
>>>> correct and  taking the female?
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 15 Jan 2016, at 16:03, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should write our own letter to get Jeremy Malcolm on CCT
>>>>> - a real consumer advocate with genuine, longtime credentials. If
>>>>> the BC can do it, we should too...
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> K
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 9:34 AM, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Sorry to bother you again.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> The BC has decided to go around the approved process and get yet
>>>>>> another commercial representative appointed to the CCT, citing
>>>>>> gender diversity. Their letter requesting special consideration is
>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> NCSG member Stacie Walsh was also nominated by two GNSO parties.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Frankly, I'm philosophically opposed to attempts to subvert the
>>>>>> process that this letter typifies. That said, I'm mindful of our
>>>>>> responsibility to aggressively represent our members.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Should we send ? a similar letter citing both gender
>>>>>> diversity and the lack of ideological diversity on the CCT; i.e.
>>>>>> we agree with the BC on the lack of gender diversity but believe
>>>>>> Stacie is the stronger candidate based upon the
>>>>>> underrepresentation both of the noncommercial community and the
>>>>>> lack of age diversity of selectees.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> I'm not sure who should approve /. disapprove this idea is ? it
>>>>>> the EC or PC?) but do think we need to consider it. We are
>>>>>> seriously underrepresented on the CCT, more so of this BC ploy is
>>>>>> successful.
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> ?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg