[PC-NCSG] CCT

[Tapani Tarvainen]

I'm afraid Ed is right here: we don't have a good case for
pushing Jeremy at this point, but if we advocate Stacie
we might succeed in either getting her in or blocking
a BC candidate.

Would someone have the time to write it up?

Tapani

On Jan 15 16:23, Edward Morris (egmorris1 at toast.net) wrote:

> Hi Kathy,
> 
> What's the hook?
> 
> Simply saying we don't like the decision won't work. The BC has come up with diversity. It's a shame Jeremy is not female but...
> 
> My fear is if we don't do anything the BC will get their request. If we send another female they probably won't change anything or they could take both. Given they have already been accused of taking too many men...
> 
> Do you really think there is a chance they would take another man or that suggesting they do would stop them from saying that the BC was correct and  taking the female?
> 
> Ed 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 16:03, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I think we should write our own letter to get Jeremy Malcolm on CCT - a real consumer advocate with genuine, longtime credentials. If the BC can do it, we should too...
> > Best,
> > K
> > 
> >> On 1/15/2016 9:34 AM, Edward Morris wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >> ? 
> >> Sorry to bother you again.
> >> ? 
> >> The BC has decided to go around the approved process and get yet another commercial representative appointed to the CCT, citing gender diversity. Their letter requesting special consideration is attached.
> >> ? 
> >> NCSG member Stacie Walsh was also nominated by two GNSO parties.
> >> ? 
> >> Frankly, I'm philosophically opposed to attempts to subvert the process that this letter typifies. That said, I'm mindful of our responsibility to aggressively represent our members.
> >> ? 
> >> Should we send ? a similar letter citing both gender           diversity and the lack of ideological diversity on the CCT; i.e. we agree with the BC on the lack of gender diversity but believe Stacie is the stronger candidate based upon the underrepresentation both of the noncommercial community and the lack of age diversity of selectees.
> >> ? 
> >> I'm not sure who should approve /. disapprove this idea is ? it the EC or PC?) but do think we need to consider it. We are seriously underrepresented on the CCT, more so of this BC ploy is successful.
> >> ? 
> >> Best,
> >> ? 
> >> Ed
> >> ? 
> >> ?