[PC-NCSG] CCT

[Stephanie Perrin]

who are they putting forward?  KIran Manchuravil?
SP

On 2016-01-15 11:23, Edward Morris wrote:
> Hi Kathy,
>
> What's the hook?
>
> Simply saying we don't like the decision won't work. The BC has come 
> up with diversity. It's a shame Jeremy is not female but...
>
> My fear is if we don't do anything the BC will get their request. If 
> we send another female they probably won't change anything or they 
> could take both. Given they have already been accused of taking too 
> many men...
>
> Do you really think there is a chance they would take another man or 
> that suggesting they do would stop them from saying that the BC was 
> correct and  taking the female?
>
> Ed
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 16:03, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com 
> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>> wrote:
>
>> I think we should write our own letter to get Jeremy Malcolm on CCT - 
>> a real consumer advocate with genuine, longtime credentials. If the 
>> BC can do it, we should too...
>> Best,
>> K
>>
>> On 1/15/2016 9:34 AM, Edward Morris wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> ?
>>> Sorry to bother you again.
>>> ?
>>> The BC has decided to go around the approved process and get yet 
>>> another commercial representative appointed to the CCT, citing 
>>> gender diversity. Their letter requesting special consideration is 
>>> attached.
>>> ?
>>> NCSG member Stacie Walsh was also nominated by two GNSO parties.
>>> ?
>>> Frankly, I'm philosophically opposed to attempts to subvert the 
>>> process that this letter typifies. That said, I'm mindful of our 
>>> responsibility to aggressively represent our members.
>>> ?
>>> Should we send ? a similar letter citing both gender diversity and 
>>> the lack of ideological diversity on the CCT; i.e. we agree with the 
>>> BC on the lack of gender diversity but believe Stacie is the 
>>> stronger candidate based upon the underrepresentation both of the 
>>> noncommercial community and the lack of age diversity of selectees.
>>> ?
>>> I'm not sure who should approve /. disapprove this idea is ? it the 
>>> EC or PC?) but do think we need to consider it. We are seriously 
>>> underrepresented on the CCT, more so of this BC ploy is successful.
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> ?
>>> Ed
>>> ?
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160115/542761d0/attachment.html>