[PC-NCSG] CCT

[Milan, Stefania]

Hi Ed, thanks for pointing this out. Gender balance/representativity should be a concern at the onset (i.e. when you select representatives), not an excuse to get away with expansions. Pointing out the process bypasses should then in principle granted to everyone would probably be a strong-enough argument
stefi

________________________________________
Da: PC-NCSG <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> per conto di Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>
Inviato: venerd? 15 gennaio 2016 15.54
A: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Oggetto: Re: [PC-NCSG] CCT

Hi Ed,

I agree on both counts: don't really like this kinds of process bypass
in principle, but if BC is doing it, we should too.

As for EC vs. PC, I'd tend to think PC would be more appropriate
(without digging into our charter).

Tapani

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:34:30AM -0500, Edward Morris (egmorris1 at toast.net) wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
>  Sorry to bother you again.
>
>  The BC has decided to go around the approved process and get yet another
> commercial representative appointed to the CCT, citing gender diversity.
> Their letter requesting special consideration is attached.
>
>  NCSG member Stacie Walsh was also nominated by two GNSO parties.
>
>  Frankly, I'm philosophically opposed to attempts to subvert the process
> that this letter typifies. That said, I'm mindful of our responsibility to
> aggressively represent our members.
>
>  Should we send  a similar letter citing both gender diversity and the lack
> of ideological diversity on the CCT; i.e. we agree with the BC on the lack
> of gender diversity but believe Stacie is the stronger candidate based upon
> the underrepresentation both of the noncommercial community and the lack of
> age diversity of selectees.
>
>  I'm not sure who should approve /. disapprove this idea is  it the EC or
> PC?) but do think we need to consider it. We are seriously underrepresented
> on the CCT, more so of this BC ploy is successful.
>
>  Best,
>
>  Ed
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.