[PC-NCSG] Guidance Requested

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Remaining a California Corp is one of the sacred cows.  Any mention of
moving it brings rapid response from the business oriented voices and
the claim that without this the Us congress would never accept and thus
NTIA could not approve.

I think it is unfortunate, don't support it, but think of it as a battle
that isn't worth fighting because it can't be won at this point in time,
I tried arguing against it at an ealrier point and got nowhere. At some
future date, after ICANN vassalage to the US Gov't ends it may be
possible to think about this and then deal with the bylaws if necessary.

avri

On 15-Jan-16 08:03, Edward Morris wrote:
> Chair Amr, all,
>  
>  
> I need some guidance from the PC on the following issue so I can
> properly represent our views on Council and on the Council CCWG sub-team:
>  
>  
> Do we support requiring ICANN to keep its headquarters in California?
>  
> If so, should it be almost impossible to change this requirement or
> just pretty hard?
>  
>  
> Thanks for weighing in. I can argue both sides and really am
> ambivalent. It would be helpful to me to know what those on the PC think.
>  
> Thanks for considering,
>  
> Ed
>  
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus